Skip to content

Conversation

kroeckx
Copy link

@kroeckx kroeckx commented May 21, 2020

The signing is based on what https://rpki.cloudflare.com/?view=bgp
returns. It's probably not ideal, but it's the best I know.
I have used:
< 10% valid signatures: not signing

90% valid signatures: signing
otherwise: partial signing

The signing is based on what https://rpki.cloudflare.com/?view=bgp
returns. It's probably not ideal, but it's the best I know.
I have used:
< 10% valid signatures: not signing
> 90% valid signatures: signing
otherwise: partial signing
@kroeckx
Copy link
Author

kroeckx commented May 30, 2020

Do you intend to merge this? It now of course contains a merge conflict since you've merged something. I don't intend to fix the merge conflict unless you want to merge this.

@jejenone
Copy link
Contributor

@kroeckx Yes we can merge this. Please follow-up with conflicts and we'll proceed.

@digizeph digizeph added the status: pending response Pending response from the issue/PR opener label Jul 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

status: pending response Pending response from the issue/PR opener

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants