-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
[GCC14] Fix compiler warnings #47556
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-47556/44037 |
A new Pull Request was created by @iarspider for master. It involves the following packages:
@Moanwar, @aloeliger, @antoniovagnerini, @civanch, @cmsbuild, @epalencia, @jfernan2, @kpedro88, @mandrenguyen, @mdhildreth, @rseidita, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test for el8_amd64_gcc14 |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-47556/44038
|
Pull request #47556 was updated. @Moanwar, @aloeliger, @antoniovagnerini, @civanch, @epalencia, @jfernan2, @kpedro88, @mandrenguyen, @mdhildreth, @rseidita, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please check and sign again. |
ccd71c5
to
8e4cbef
Compare
please test for el8_amd64_gcc14 |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3d4c01/44916/summary.html CMS deprecated warnings: 4 CMS deprecated warnings found, see summary page for details. Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 why so main problems in regression tests? |
I guess because of the non- regular arch used in the build
|
hi @iarspider , can you confirm that all the failures in the comparison tests are expected from the non-regular arch for the build? |
@antoniovagnerini I'm not an expect in that area, but it's well know that a lot of comparisions fail when comparing with non-default architecture or flavor. Let's start the test for default arch just to be sure. |
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+dqm
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @mandrenguyen (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@cms-sw/orp-l2 gentle ping |
+1 |
PR description:
Title says it all.
PR validation:
Bot tests