Phase2-gex187Y Create the scenario for V19 (still under test)

[bsunanda]

PR description:

Create the scenario for V19 (still under test)

PR validation:

Only the SIM step is complete. We are working on improving different options. There are several issues still to be completed. It is an interim state and required for debugging this version.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Nothing special

[cmsbuild]

cms-bot internal usage

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-47695/44245

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:
  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py modified in PR(s): CA Extension to strips #47090, add vertex trimming to the phase2 hlt tracking iterations #47113, Fix missing CaloParticles from pileup #47682

[bsunanda]

@cmsbuild Please test

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/Geometry (upgrade, geometry)
• Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (upgrade, pdmv)
• Configuration/StandardSequences (operations)
• Geometry/CMSCommonData (upgrade, geometry)

@AdrianoDee, @Dr15Jones, @Moanwar, @antoniovilela, @bsunanda, @civanch, @davidlange6, @DickyChant, @fabiocos, @kpedro88, @makortel, @mandrenguyen, @mdhildreth, @miquork, @rappoccio, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@GiacomoSguazzoni, @Martin-Grunewald, @VinInn, @VourMa, @dgulhan, @fabiocos, @felicepantaleo, @makortel, @martinamalberti, @missirol, @mmusich, @mtosi, @rovere, @sameasy, @slomeo, @vargasa this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[cmsbuild]

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 72KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d82a87/45204/summary.html
COMMIT: 590d5cd
CMSSW: CMSSW_15_1_X_2025-03-25-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/47695/45204/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially removed 2 lines from the logs
• Reco comparison results: 6 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3909207
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 24
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3909163
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 49 files compared)
• Checked 215 log files, 184 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[bsunanda]

+geometry

[bsunanda]

@subirsarkar Please approve this

[bsunanda]

@Moanwar, @subirsarkar, Please approve this

[Moanwar]

+Upgrade

[bsunanda]

@AdrianoDee, Please approve this PR

[AdrianoDee]

+pdmv

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[AdrianoDee]

Unrelated to this PR (already signed) but why we have naming for Phase2 eras that does not sound like they correspond to the actual detector setup. E.g. here Phase2C22I13M9 suggest C22+I13+M9 but D120 is different. Is it that there's no needed modification (in terms of era) from C22+I13+M9 to C26+I20+M15?

[bsunanda]

It is not strictly necessary here. The transition to C22 happened because of handling two collections in a calorimeter class.. Otherwise C17 would have been sufficient. I think for all new scenarios should use C22 rather than C17. The jumps from Mx to My follows similar principles.

[mandrenguyen]

+1