-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
Force use of RNTuple in RelVal workflows #47718
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Force use of RNTuple in RelVal workflows #47718
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones for CMSSW_15_1_RNTUPLE_X. It involves the following packages:
@AdrianoDee, @Dr15Jones, @Moanwar, @antoniovilela, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @DickyChant, @fabiocos, @makortel, @mandrenguyen, @miquork, @rappoccio, @smuzaffar, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
cms-bot internal usage |
please test |
@@ -209,6 +209,9 @@ def readMatrix(self, fileNameIn, useInput=None, refRel=None, fromScratch=None): | |||
wfName = wfInfo[0] | |||
stepList = wfInfo[1] | |||
stepOverrides=wfInfo.overrides | |||
#force use of RNTuple | |||
stepOverrides['--rntuple_out']='' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@smuzaffar We want to pass the --rntuple_out
to runTheMatrix.py
for the IB and PR tests of the RNTUPLE_X IB. Is it more convenient to do it in the runTheMatrix
code (in the RNTUPLE_X branch) as here, or via the cms-bot?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For this PR, that is not needed as the above line adds --rntuple_out
to ALL workflows. In fact, I didn't add an option to runTheMatrix.py
to use such a command line option.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@makortel , it will be easier if we do it via runTheMatrix itself. This way it will be enabled for IB and PR tests. May be add it conditionally e.g if 'RNTUPLE_X' in os.environ['CMSSW_VERSION']
then add it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
May be add it conditionally e.g
if 'RNTUPLE_X' in os.environ['CMSSW_VERSION']
then add it?
Some kind of conditional will be needed if this logic would enter the master
branch (or "eventually" and "when"). This PR targets the RNTUPLE_X
branch, so technically unconditional would be ok. Generally I'd like to keep the runTheMatrix
and cmsDriver
code as close as possible between master
and RNTUPLE_X
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that keeping them close is important. That is why that change is in its own commit.
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Unit TestsI found 1 errors in the following unit tests: ---> test TestConfigurationApplicationsConfigBuilder had ERRORS RelVals
|
@smuzaffar Could we actually enable the MaxMemoryPreload ( |
Pull request #47718 was updated. @AdrianoDee, @Dr15Jones, @Moanwar, @antoniovilela, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @DickyChant, @fabiocos, @makortel, @mandrenguyen, @miquork, @rappoccio, @smuzaffar, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals
|
test parameters:
|
please test |
This information is now in classes_def.xml.
2f8b5bd
to
ffce48b
Compare
Pull request #47718 was updated. @AdrianoDee, @Dr15Jones, @Moanwar, @cmsbuild, @DickyChant, @makortel, @miquork, @smuzaffar, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2d6247/45542/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+core Matrix test outputs showed |
@cms-sw/pdmv-l2 @cms-sw/upgrade-l2 Please note this PR is for |
+pdmv |
+Upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_15_1_RNTUPLE_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_15_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @mandrenguyen, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
PR validation:
Did runTheMatrix.py for workflows 1.0, 7.0 and 11834.99.
resolves cms-sw/framework-team#1315, cms-sw/framework-team#1314