-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.5k
Migrate LST inputs to SoA collections #47793
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-47793/44377
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-47793/44378
|
A new Pull Request was created by @ariostas for master. It involves the following packages:
@Martin-Grunewald, @antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @mmusich, @rseidita can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild please test |
@slava77 I would propose we start testing also the .755 workflow to make sure that LST in Phase 2 HLT works fine. |
I don't see an accelerator specifier in this workflow. |
It should be in the "workflows" (not the "workflows_gpu") list. |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-CUDA RelVals-ROCM Comparison SummarySummary:
|
In the last force push, I simplified the commit history by squashing together a few of the commits. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-47793/44732
|
Pull request #47793 was updated. @antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @rseidita can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 44KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
CUDA Comparison SummarySummary:
ROCM Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+dqm
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @mandrenguyen, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
This PR refactors the LST inputs so that Portable SoA Collections are used from the very beginning. It also deduplicates some code since there were separate functions for standalone and CMSSW that played the same role.
It's mostly done, but we have a couple of questions (probably for @fwyzard or @makortel).
c.c. @slava77 @VourMa