Skip to content

Updating DT Calibration workflows for CMSSW_15_0_4 #47869

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: CMSSW_15_0_X
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

andreypz
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Updating DT Calibration workflows to run in the latest CMSSW releases.
Details on the workflows are documented here: CMS/DTCalibrationTools

The updates mainly include minor fixes to a few script to make them run in the latest CMSSW version, and some additional debug print statements.

PR validation:

We have run the calibration procedure on one recent Runs and it works as expected.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #47869 was updated.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cms-bot internal usage

@andreypz andreypz changed the title Dev dt calib april2025 Updating DT Calibration workflows for CMSSW_15_0_4 Apr 15, 2025
@@ -254,12 +260,12 @@ def addPoolDBESSource( process,

calibDB = cms.ESSource("PoolDBESSource",
CondDB,
timetype = cms.string('runnumber'),
#timetype = cms.string('runnumber'),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just to mention that this will conflict with #47851

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, actually the opposite. The line is commented out not to conflict with that change.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, I see what you mean. This change is already made in that PR. That's fine. When there is time to merge, I will resolve the conflicts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants