Skip to content

[DO NOT MERGE] [FULLSIM] Use FTFP_BERT_EMM - should not to be merged #47870

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

civanch
Copy link
Contributor

@civanch civanch commented Apr 15, 2025

PR description:

This PR is created not to be merged to the master but to be used for the special IB, which will be created after CMSSW_15_1_0_pre2.

PR validation:

private

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for: NO

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cms-bot internal usage

@civanch civanch changed the title [FULLSIM] Use FTFP_BERT_EMM [FULLSIM] Use FTFP_BERT_EMM - should not to be merged Apr 15, 2025
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @civanch for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • SimG4Core/Application (simulation)

@civanch, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@bsunanda, @fabiocos, @makortel, @martinamalberti, @rovere, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@antoniovilela antoniovilela changed the title [FULLSIM] Use FTFP_BERT_EMM - should not to be merged [DO NOT MERGE] [FULLSIM] Use FTFP_BERT_EMM - should not to be merged Apr 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants