Skip to content

Conversation

@saswatinandan
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is to add option in cmsDriver for reco step so that new rawSecond dataformat (49036) can be used.

For example:

cmsDriver.py step3 --conditions 151X_dataRun3_Prompt_v1 -s RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO --datatier RECO --eventcontent RECO --data --process reRECO --scenario pp --era Run3_pp_on_PbPb_approxSiStripClusters_2025 --customise Configuration/DataProcessing/RecoTLR.customisePostEra_Run3 --hltProcess reHLT -n 100 --no_exec --repacked --rawSecond

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 26, 2025

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-49481/46963

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @saswatinandan for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/Applications (operations)
  • Configuration/DataProcessing (operations)

@cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @ftenchini, @mandrenguyen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @fabiocos, @makortel this is something you requested to watch as well.
@ftenchini, @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Nov 27, 2025

This PR is to add option in cmsDriver for reco step so that new rawSecond dataformat (#49036) can be used.

would it not be better to package it into an era (e.g. Run3_pp_on_PbPb_rawSecond_2025) and corresponding reconstruction scenario?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-49481/46996

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #49481 was updated. @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @ftenchini, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @srimanob can you please check and sign again.

@saswatinandan
Copy link
Contributor Author

New command to run the reco step as follow:
cmsDriver.py step3 --conditions 151X_dataRun3_Prompt_v1 -s RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO --datatier RECO --eventcontent RECO --data --process reRECO --scenario pp --era Run3_pp_on_PbPb_approxSiStripClusters_2025_rawSecond --customise Configuration/DataProcessing/RecoTLR.customisePostEra_Run3 --hltProcess reHLT -n 100 --no_exec --repacked

self.pythonCfgCode +="from Configuration.Applications.ConfigBuilder import MassReplaceInputTag\n"
self.pythonCfgCode +="MassReplaceInputTag(process, new=\"rawDataMapperByLabel\", old=\"rawDataCollector\")\n"
MassReplaceInputTag(self.process, new="rawDataMapperByLabel", old="rawDataCollector")

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this line is now unnecessary.

from Configuration.ProcessModifiers.rawSecond_cff import rawSecond
rawSecond.toModify(RAWEventContent,
outputCommands = RAWEventContent.outputCommands+[
'keep *_hltSiStripClusters2ApproxClustersv1_*_*',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking forwarrd, do you want to use the rawSecond modifier always in conjunction of approxSiStripClusters? In that case I think you might want to make sure you drop the other version of the approximate clusters. In that case also adding DetIds_hltSiStripRawToDigi_*_* is redundant.

])

rawSecond.toModify(FEVTDEBUGEventContent,
outputCommands = FEVTDEBUGEventContent.outputCommands+[
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as above.

])
rawSecond.toModify(FEVTDEBUGHLTEventContent,
outputCommands = FEVTDEBUGHLTEventContent.outputCommands+[
'keep *_hltSiStripClusters2ApproxClustersv1_*_*',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as above.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-49481/46999

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #49481 was updated. @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @ftenchini, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @srimanob can you please check and sign again.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Nov 27, 2025

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 72KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7db3bc/49717/summary.html
COMMIT: aed6da1
CMSSW: CMSSW_16_0_X_2025-11-27-1100/el8_amd64_gcc13
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/49481/49717/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

DAS Queries: The DAS query tests failed, see the summary page for details.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 2 lines from the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • Reco comparison had 4 failed jobs
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 53
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 4269233
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 64
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 4269149
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 52 files compared)
  • Checked 227 log files, 198 edm output root files, 53 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @mandrenguyen, @ftenchini, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 505e43f into cms-sw:master Nov 27, 2025
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants