-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
adding options for reco step using new rawSecond input #49481
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-49481/46963
|
|
A new Pull Request was created by @saswatinandan for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @ftenchini, @mandrenguyen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
would it not be better to package it into an era (e.g. |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-49481/46996
|
|
Pull request #49481 was updated. @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @ftenchini, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @srimanob can you please check and sign again. |
|
New command to run the reco step as follow: |
| self.pythonCfgCode +="from Configuration.Applications.ConfigBuilder import MassReplaceInputTag\n" | ||
| self.pythonCfgCode +="MassReplaceInputTag(process, new=\"rawDataMapperByLabel\", old=\"rawDataCollector\")\n" | ||
| MassReplaceInputTag(self.process, new="rawDataMapperByLabel", old="rawDataCollector") | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this line is now unnecessary.
| from Configuration.ProcessModifiers.rawSecond_cff import rawSecond | ||
| rawSecond.toModify(RAWEventContent, | ||
| outputCommands = RAWEventContent.outputCommands+[ | ||
| 'keep *_hltSiStripClusters2ApproxClustersv1_*_*', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking forwarrd, do you want to use the rawSecond modifier always in conjunction of approxSiStripClusters? In that case I think you might want to make sure you drop the other version of the approximate clusters. In that case also adding DetIds_hltSiStripRawToDigi_*_* is redundant.
| ]) | ||
|
|
||
| rawSecond.toModify(FEVTDEBUGEventContent, | ||
| outputCommands = FEVTDEBUGEventContent.outputCommands+[ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
as above.
| ]) | ||
| rawSecond.toModify(FEVTDEBUGHLTEventContent, | ||
| outputCommands = FEVTDEBUGHLTEventContent.outputCommands+[ | ||
| 'keep *_hltSiStripClusters2ApproxClustersv1_*_*', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
as above.
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-49481/46999
|
|
Pull request #49481 was updated. @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @ftenchini, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @srimanob can you please check and sign again. |
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 72KB to repository DAS Queries: The DAS query tests failed, see the summary page for details. Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
+1 |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @mandrenguyen, @ftenchini, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 |
This PR is to add option in cmsDriver for reco step so that new rawSecond dataformat (49036) can be used.
For example: