Make label-analysis and static-analysis noops

[Swatinem]

This rips out all of static-analysis including building treesitter languages and processing source files.

Ripping out label-analysis works rather by running the fallback code unconditionally without making requests to the backend API.

---

I would still wait with this a little until we have the final go-ahead in codecov/engineering-team#3364

[github-actions]

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests were found.

📣 Thoughts on this report? Let Codecov know! | Powered by Codecov

[codecov]

❌ 5 Tests Failed:

Tests completed	Failed	Passed	Skipped
3420	5	3415	0

View the top 3 failed test(s) by shortest run time

api.temp.calculator.test_calculator::test_divide

Stack Traces | 0.001s run time

def
                test_divide():
                > assert Calculator.divide(1, 2) == 0.5
                E assert 1.0 == 0.5
                E + where 1.0 = <function Calculator.divide at 0x104c9eb90>(1, 2)
                E + where <function Calculator.divide at 0x104c9eb90> = Calculator.divide
                .../temp/calculator/test_calculator.py:30: AssertionError

api.temp.calculator.test_calculator::test_divide

Stack Traces | 0.001s run time

def
                test_divide():
                > assert Calculator.divide(1, 2) == 0.5
                E assert 1.0 == 0.5
                E + where 1.0 = <function Calculator.divide at 0x104c9eb90>(1, 2)
                E + where <function Calculator.divide at 0x104c9eb90> = Calculator.divide
                .../temp/calculator/test_calculator.py:30: AssertionError

api.temp.calculator.test_calculator::test_divide

Stack Traces | 0.001s run time

def
                test_divide():
                > assert Calculator.divide(1, 2) == 0.5
                E assert 1.0 == 0.5
                E + where 1.0 = <function Calculator.divide at 0x104c9eb90>(1, 2)
                E + where <function Calculator.divide at 0x104c9eb90> = Calculator.divide
                .../temp/calculator/test_calculator.py:30: AssertionError

To view more test analytics, go to the Test Analytics Dashboard
_{📋 Got 3 mins? Take this short survey to help us improve Test Analytics.}

[thomasrockhu-codecov]

I'd like to split the build changes from the noop changes in a different PR. We've had issues with our build system already recently and I'd like to ensure that these changes will still produce the correct assets.

[Swatinem]

I split out the build system related changes to #664