Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bug: Upgrading PostgreSQL from version 14 to 17 without a data migration path will break existing self-hosted deployments with persistent data.
(Severity: Critical 0.85 | Confidence: 0.98)
🔍 Detailed Analysis
The
postgresservice image is upgraded frompostgres:14-alpinetopostgres:17-alpine, which is a major version upgrade. For existing self-hosted deployments that use the persistentpostgres-volume, the new PostgreSQL 17 container will attempt to read data files created by PostgreSQL 14. Due to binary incompatibility between major PostgreSQL versions, this will cause the container to fail on startup, making the service unavailable. The change lacks the necessary data migration scripts (e.g., usingpg_upgradeorpg_dump) or documentation to guide users through the upgrade process.💡 Suggested Fix
Provide a data migration strategy for users with existing data. This could involve documenting a manual
pg_dump/pg_restoreprocess, providing a migration script, or using a tool likepgautoupgrade. At a minimum, clearly document this as a breaking change and advise users on how to handle their existing data.🤖 Prompt for AI Agent
Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.