Add cross-platform printing API (com.codename1.printing) by shai-almog · Pull Request #5217 · codenameone/CodenameOne

shai-almog · 2026-06-11T04:00:48Z

Summary

New cross-platform printing API that hands a document (PDF or image file in FileSystemStorage) to the platform printing system, typically through the native print dialog.

if (Printer.isPrintingSupported()) {
    Printer.printPDF(reportPath, result -> {
        if (result.isFailed()) {
            ToastBar.showErrorMessage("Print failed: " + result.getError());
        }
    });
}

Core — com.codename1.printing: Printer static facade (print(filePath, mimeType, listener), printPDF, printImage which encodes to a temp PNG), immutable PrintResult (COMPLETED / CANCELLED / FAILED factories, mirroring ShareResult), PrintResultListener (invoked exactly once, on the EDT). Plumbed through Display.print(...) (EDT-wrapping, same pattern as share) with overridable defaults in CodenameOneImplementation.

COMPLETED means "handed to the printing system"; platforms that can't observe the native dialog's outcome report it best-effort, documented per method.

Port implementations

Port	Mechanism
JavaSE	Images via `PrinterJob` + native dialog (real cancel detection, aspect-fit); PDFs via `Desktop.print` with a `javax.print` PDF-flavor fallback
Android	`android.print.PrintManager`: PDFs through a streaming `PrintDocumentAdapter`, images through support-v4 `PrintHelper`; job outcome via `PrintJob` state polling; all API-19+ types isolated in a `@TargetApi(19)` inner class
iOS	`UIPrintInteractionController` via the `IOSNative` bridge, following the `socialShareWithCallback` callback-id pattern; iPad presents from a rect
JavaScript	Blob object URL (reusing `openFileAsBlob`/`BlobUtil`) + hidden iframe + `contentWindow.print()`, `afterprint` + fallback completion
Windows	New `cn1_windows_print.cpp`: `PrintDlgW` on the pump thread (same `SendMessage` handover as the file dialog, `WM_APP+23`), images via the shared WIC decoder + GDI `StretchDIBits`, PDFs via raw-ABI `Windows.Data.Pdf` page rendering at printer DPI — no STL, no new link libraries

Also adds Samples/samples/PrinterSample (prints a generated image and a downloaded PDF).

Verification

mvn compile clean for core, javase, android, ios and windows modules; JS port compiles via the same javac step its build script uses; sample compiles against core.
Windows: CleanTargetIntegrationTest#crossCompilesWindowsExeWithXwin passes on this branch — full translate + clang-cl compile + lld-link of a Form app including the print code into a Windows PE (x64), against the current master port (no WM_APP message collision with the new file picker). cn1_windows_print.cpp is also registered in the per-file clang-cl compile check.
JavaSE path tested interactively in the simulator via PrinterSample (native macOS print dialog, image print + cancel reporting).

Not yet runtime-tested

iOS (ObjC mirrors the share pattern; needs a device build), Android dialog flow, Windows dialog→spool/PDF rendering on real hardware, and browser printing. PrinterSample is the quickest smoke test on each.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Printer/PrintResult/PrintResultListener with Display plumbing and implementations in all ports: JavaSE (PrinterJob/Desktop.print), Android (android.print + PrintHelper), iOS (UIPrintInteractionController), JavaScript (blob URL + hidden iframe), Windows (PrintDlg + GDI with Windows.Data.Pdf page rendering). Includes PrinterSample. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

github-actions · 2026-06-11T04:13:34Z

✅ ByteCodeTranslator Quality Report

Test & Coverage

✅ Tests: 388 total, 0 failed, 12 skipped

Benchmark Results

Execution Time: 20782 ms
Hotspots (Top 20 sampled methods):
- 25.49% java.lang.String.indexOf (595 samples)
- 20.48% com.codename1.tools.translator.Parser.isMethodUsed (478 samples)
- 5.74% java.util.ArrayList.indexOf (134 samples)
- 5.57% com.codename1.tools.translator.BytecodeMethod.addToConstantPool (130 samples)
- 5.48% com.codename1.tools.translator.Parser.addToConstantPool (128 samples)
- 3.21% com.codename1.tools.translator.ByteCodeClass.calcUsedByNative (75 samples)
- 2.10% com.codename1.tools.translator.ByteCodeClass.updateAllDependencies (49 samples)
- 1.97% com.codename1.tools.translator.BytecodeMethod.appendMethodSignatureSuffixFromDesc (46 samples)
- 1.71% org.objectweb.asm.ClassReader.readCode (40 samples)
- 1.59% com.codename1.tools.translator.ByteCodeClass.markDependent (37 samples)
- 1.37% java.lang.StringBuilder.append (32 samples)
- 1.03% com.codename1.tools.translator.bytecodes.Invoke.addDependencies (24 samples)
- 0.99% com.codename1.tools.translator.Parser.getClassByName (23 samples)
- 0.99% com.codename1.tools.translator.Parser.generateClassAndMethodIndexHeader (23 samples)
- 0.81% com.codename1.tools.translator.BytecodeMethod.optimize (19 samples)
- 0.77% java.lang.Object.hashCode (18 samples)
- 0.77% com.codename1.tools.translator.BytecodeMethod.addInstruction (18 samples)
- 0.69% java.util.TreeMap.getEntry (16 samples)
- 0.69% java.lang.System.identityHashCode (16 samples)
- 0.69% com.codename1.tools.translator.BytecodeMethod.appendCMethodPrefix (16 samples)
⚠️ Coverage report not generated.

Static Analysis

✅ SpotBugs: no findings (report was not generated by the build).
⚠️ PMD report not generated.
⚠️ Checkstyle report not generated.

Generated automatically by the PR CI workflow.

shai-almog · 2026-06-11T04:16:25Z

Compared 11 screenshots: 11 matched.
✅ JavaSE simulator integration screenshots matched stored baselines.

shai-almog · 2026-06-11T04:17:54Z

Compared 128 screenshots: 128 matched.

Native Android coverage

📊 Line coverage: 14.22% (8645/60799 lines covered) [HTML preview] (artifact android-coverage-report, jacocoAndroidReport/html/index.html)
- Other counters: instruction 11.51% (42600/370069), branch 5.06% (1762/34801), complexity 6.05% (2018/33356), method 10.47% (1633/15593), class 17.14% (377/2200)
- Lowest covered classes
  - kotlin.collections.kotlin.collections.ArraysKt___ArraysKt – 0.00% (0/6327 lines covered)
  - kotlin.collections.unsigned.kotlin.collections.unsigned.UArraysKt___UArraysKt – 0.00% (0/2384 lines covered)
  - org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_b6258fc.asm.org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_b6258fc.asm.ClassReader – 0.00% (0/1519 lines covered)
  - kotlin.collections.kotlin.collections.CollectionsKt___CollectionsKt – 0.00% (0/1148 lines covered)
  - org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_b6258fc.asm.org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_b6258fc.asm.MethodWriter – 0.00% (0/923 lines covered)
  - kotlin.sequences.kotlin.sequences.SequencesKt___SequencesKt – 0.00% (0/730 lines covered)
  - kotlin.text.kotlin.text.StringsKt___StringsKt – 0.00% (0/623 lines covered)
  - org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_b6258fc.asm.org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_b6258fc.asm.Frame – 0.00% (0/564 lines covered)
  - kotlin.collections.kotlin.collections.ArraysKt___ArraysJvmKt – 0.00% (0/495 lines covered)
  - kotlinx.coroutines.kotlinx.coroutines.JobSupport – 0.00% (0/423 lines covered)

✅ Native Android screenshot tests passed.

Native Android coverage

📊 Line coverage: 14.22% (8645/60799 lines covered) [HTML preview] (artifact android-coverage-report, jacocoAndroidReport/html/index.html)
- Other counters: instruction 11.51% (42600/370069), branch 5.06% (1762/34801), complexity 6.05% (2018/33356), method 10.47% (1633/15593), class 17.14% (377/2200)
- Lowest covered classes
  - kotlin.collections.kotlin.collections.ArraysKt___ArraysKt – 0.00% (0/6327 lines covered)
  - kotlin.collections.unsigned.kotlin.collections.unsigned.UArraysKt___UArraysKt – 0.00% (0/2384 lines covered)
  - org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_b6258fc.asm.org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_b6258fc.asm.ClassReader – 0.00% (0/1519 lines covered)
  - kotlin.collections.kotlin.collections.CollectionsKt___CollectionsKt – 0.00% (0/1148 lines covered)
  - org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_b6258fc.asm.org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_b6258fc.asm.MethodWriter – 0.00% (0/923 lines covered)
  - kotlin.sequences.kotlin.sequences.SequencesKt___SequencesKt – 0.00% (0/730 lines covered)
  - kotlin.text.kotlin.text.StringsKt___StringsKt – 0.00% (0/623 lines covered)
  - org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_b6258fc.asm.org.jacoco.agent.rt.internal_b6258fc.asm.Frame – 0.00% (0/564 lines covered)
  - kotlin.collections.kotlin.collections.ArraysKt___ArraysJvmKt – 0.00% (0/495 lines covered)
  - kotlinx.coroutines.kotlinx.coroutines.JobSupport – 0.00% (0/423 lines covered)

Benchmark Results

Detailed Performance Metrics

Metric	Duration
SIMD kernel backend	scalar fallback (no native SIMD)
SIMD int-add (64K x300)	java 241ms / native 137ms = 1.7x speedup
SIMD float-mul (64K x300)	java 163ms / native 126ms = 1.2x speedup
SIMD kernel correctness	PASS (native result == scalar reference)
Base64 payload size	8192 bytes
Base64 benchmark iterations	6000
Base64 SIMD byte path	gated to scalar (CPU autovectorizes scalar; explicit SIMD not beneficial here)
Base64 CN1 encode	184.000 ms
Base64 CN1 decode	576.000 ms
Base64 native encode	672.000 ms
Base64 encode ratio (CN1/native)	0.274x (72.6% faster)
Base64 native decode	1177.000 ms
Base64 decode ratio (CN1/native)	0.489x (51.1% faster)
Image encode benchmark status	skipped (SIMD unsupported)

shai-almog · 2026-06-11T04:20:32Z

Compared 125 screenshots: 125 matched.
Native Windows port (x64 / Intel-AMD): full hellocodenameone screenshot suite rendered offscreen with Direct2D/DirectWrite, plus the real benchmarks (base64 native/CN1/SIMD, image createMask/applyMask/modifyAlpha/PNG/JPEG, SSE2 SIMD kernels). Compared against the in-repo baseline in scripts/windows/screenshots.

Benchmark Results

Detailed Performance Metrics

Metric	Duration
SIMD kernel backend	SSE2 (x64) / NEON (arm64) native kernels
SIMD int-add (64K x300)	java 82ms / native 5ms = 16.4x speedup
SIMD float-mul (64K x300)	java 73ms / native 4ms = 18.2x speedup
SIMD kernel correctness	PASS (native result == scalar reference)
Base64 native bridge	unavailable (CN1 + SIMD + image benchmarks only)
Base64 payload size	8192 bytes
Base64 benchmark iterations	6000
Base64 SIMD byte path	gated to scalar (CPU autovectorizes scalar; explicit SIMD not beneficial here)
Base64 CN1 encode	298.000 ms
Base64 CN1 decode	175.000 ms
Base64 SIMD encode	130.000 ms
Base64 encode ratio (SIMD/CN1)	0.436x (56.4% faster)
Base64 SIMD decode	132.000 ms
Base64 decode ratio (SIMD/CN1)	0.754x (24.6% faster)
Image encode benchmark iterations	100
Image createMask (SIMD off)	34.000 ms
Image createMask (SIMD on)	13.000 ms
Image createMask ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.382x (61.8% faster)
Image applyMask (SIMD off)	52.000 ms
Image applyMask (SIMD on)	26.000 ms
Image applyMask ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.500x (50.0% faster)
Image modifyAlpha (SIMD off)	53.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha (SIMD on)	19.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.358x (64.2% faster)
Image modifyAlpha removeColor (SIMD off)	58.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha removeColor (SIMD on)	22.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha removeColor ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.379x (62.1% faster)

shai-almog · 2026-06-11T04:21:53Z

Compared 125 screenshots: 125 matched.
Native Windows port, REAL shipping pipeline: the hellocodenameone screenshot suite rendered by a binary CROSS-COMPILED on Linux (clang-cl + xwin, WebView2 linked) and RUN on a Windows x64 runner. Compared against the in-repo baseline in scripts/windows/screenshots.

Benchmark Results

Detailed Performance Metrics

Metric	Duration
SIMD kernel backend	SSE2 (x64) / NEON (arm64) native kernels
SIMD int-add (64K x300)	java 70ms / native 5ms = 14.0x speedup
SIMD float-mul (64K x300)	java 72ms / native 5ms = 14.4x speedup
SIMD kernel correctness	PASS (native result == scalar reference)
Base64 native bridge	unavailable (CN1 + SIMD + image benchmarks only)
Base64 payload size	8192 bytes
Base64 benchmark iterations	6000
Base64 SIMD byte path	gated to scalar (CPU autovectorizes scalar; explicit SIMD not beneficial here)
Base64 CN1 encode	276.000 ms
Base64 CN1 decode	323.000 ms
Base64 SIMD encode	143.000 ms
Base64 encode ratio (SIMD/CN1)	0.518x (48.2% faster)
Base64 SIMD decode	132.000 ms
Base64 decode ratio (SIMD/CN1)	0.409x (59.1% faster)
Image encode benchmark iterations	100
Image createMask (SIMD off)	36.000 ms
Image createMask (SIMD on)	14.000 ms
Image createMask ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.389x (61.1% faster)
Image applyMask (SIMD off)	58.000 ms
Image applyMask (SIMD on)	30.000 ms
Image applyMask ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.517x (48.3% faster)
Image modifyAlpha (SIMD off)	61.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha (SIMD on)	21.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.344x (65.6% faster)
Image modifyAlpha removeColor (SIMD off)	72.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha removeColor (SIMD on)	23.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha removeColor ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.319x (68.1% faster)

github-actions · 2026-06-11T04:22:44Z

Cloudflare Preview

URL: https://pr-5217-website-preview.codenameone.pages.dev
Branch: pr-5217-website-preview

shai-almog · 2026-06-11T04:35:34Z

Native Windows port (arm64)

Compared 125 screenshots: 124 matched, 1 updated.

graphics-draw-arc — updated screenshot. Screenshot differs (784x561 px, bit depth 8).

Preview info: JPEG preview quality 60; JPEG preview quality 60.
Full-resolution PNG saved as graphics-draw-arc.png in workflow artifacts.

Benchmark Results

Detailed Performance Metrics

Metric	Duration
SIMD kernel backend	SSE2 (x64) / NEON (arm64) native kernels
SIMD int-add (64K x300)	java 62ms / native 3ms = 20.6x speedup
SIMD float-mul (64K x300)	java 60ms / native 3ms = 20.0x speedup
SIMD kernel correctness	PASS (native result == scalar reference)
Base64 native bridge	unavailable (CN1 + SIMD + image benchmarks only)
Base64 payload size	8192 bytes
Base64 benchmark iterations	6000
Base64 SIMD byte path	gated to scalar (CPU autovectorizes scalar; explicit SIMD not beneficial here)
Base64 CN1 encode	599.000 ms
Base64 CN1 decode	236.000 ms
Base64 SIMD encode	105.000 ms
Base64 encode ratio (SIMD/CN1)	0.175x (82.5% faster)
Base64 SIMD decode	133.000 ms
Base64 decode ratio (SIMD/CN1)	0.564x (43.6% faster)
Image encode benchmark iterations	100
Image createMask (SIMD off)	24.000 ms
Image createMask (SIMD on)	8.000 ms
Image createMask ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.333x (66.7% faster)
Image applyMask (SIMD off)	38.000 ms
Image applyMask (SIMD on)	16.000 ms
Image applyMask ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.421x (57.9% faster)
Image modifyAlpha (SIMD off)	38.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha (SIMD on)	12.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.316x (68.4% faster)
Image modifyAlpha removeColor (SIMD off)	40.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha removeColor (SIMD on)	11.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha removeColor ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.275x (72.5% faster)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

shai-almog · 2026-06-11T04:58:35Z

Compared 128 screenshots: 128 matched.
✅ Native Mac screenshot tests passed.

Benchmark Results

VM Translation Time: 0 seconds
Compilation Time: 120 seconds

Detailed Performance Metrics

Metric	Duration
SIMD kernel backend	SSE2 (x64) / NEON (arm64) native kernels
SIMD int-add (64K x300)	java 83ms / native 13ms = 6.3x speedup
SIMD float-mul (64K x300)	java 49ms / native 2ms = 24.5x speedup
SIMD kernel correctness	PASS (native result == scalar reference)
Base64 payload size	8192 bytes
Base64 benchmark iterations	6000
Base64 SIMD byte path	active (NEON-accelerated)
Base64 CN1 encode	259.000 ms
Base64 CN1 decode	183.000 ms
Base64 native encode	485.000 ms
Base64 encode ratio (CN1/native)	0.534x (46.6% faster)
Base64 native decode	256.000 ms
Base64 decode ratio (CN1/native)	0.715x (28.5% faster)
Base64 SIMD encode	50.000 ms
Base64 encode ratio (SIMD/CN1)	0.193x (80.7% faster)
Base64 SIMD decode	43.000 ms
Base64 decode ratio (SIMD/CN1)	0.235x (76.5% faster)
Base64 encode ratio (SIMD/native)	0.103x (89.7% faster)
Base64 decode ratio (SIMD/native)	0.168x (83.2% faster)
Image encode benchmark iterations	100
Image createMask (SIMD off)	17.000 ms
Image createMask (SIMD on)	1.000 ms
Image createMask ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.059x (94.1% faster)
Image applyMask (SIMD off)	58.000 ms
Image applyMask (SIMD on)	50.000 ms
Image applyMask ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.862x (13.8% faster)
Image modifyAlpha (SIMD off)	63.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha (SIMD on)	35.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.556x (44.4% faster)
Image modifyAlpha removeColor (SIMD off)	67.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha removeColor (SIMD on)	44.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha removeColor ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.657x (34.3% faster)

shai-almog · 2026-06-11T05:07:47Z

Compared 128 screenshots: 128 matched.
✅ Native iOS Metal screenshot tests passed.

Benchmark Results

VM Translation Time: 0 seconds
Compilation Time: 280 seconds

Build and Run Timing

Metric	Duration
Simulator Boot	102000 ms
Simulator Boot (Run)	2000 ms
App Install	15000 ms
App Launch	6000 ms
Test Execution	267000 ms

Detailed Performance Metrics

Metric	Duration
SIMD kernel backend	SSE2 (x64) / NEON (arm64) native kernels
SIMD int-add (64K x300)	java 83ms / native 4ms = 20.7x speedup
SIMD float-mul (64K x300)	java 80ms / native 2ms = 40.0x speedup
SIMD kernel correctness	PASS (native result == scalar reference)
Base64 payload size	8192 bytes
Base64 benchmark iterations	6000
Base64 SIMD byte path	active (NEON-accelerated)
Base64 CN1 encode	471.000 ms
Base64 CN1 decode	261.000 ms
Base64 native encode	670.000 ms
Base64 encode ratio (CN1/native)	0.703x (29.7% faster)
Base64 native decode	429.000 ms
Base64 decode ratio (CN1/native)	0.608x (39.2% faster)
Base64 SIMD encode	55.000 ms
Base64 encode ratio (SIMD/CN1)	0.117x (88.3% faster)
Base64 SIMD decode	48.000 ms
Base64 decode ratio (SIMD/CN1)	0.184x (81.6% faster)
Base64 encode ratio (SIMD/native)	0.082x (91.8% faster)
Base64 decode ratio (SIMD/native)	0.112x (88.8% faster)
Image encode benchmark iterations	100
Image createMask (SIMD off)	27.000 ms
Image createMask (SIMD on)	4.000 ms
Image createMask ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.148x (85.2% faster)
Image applyMask (SIMD off)	67.000 ms
Image applyMask (SIMD on)	35.000 ms
Image applyMask ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.522x (47.8% faster)
Image modifyAlpha (SIMD off)	69.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha (SIMD on)	41.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.594x (40.6% faster)
Image modifyAlpha removeColor (SIMD off)	56.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha removeColor (SIMD on)	39.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha removeColor ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.696x (30.4% faster)

github-actions · 2026-06-11T05:20:39Z

✅ Continuous Quality Report

Test & Coverage

✅ Tests: 3114 total, 0 failed, 1 skipped
📊 Line coverage: 54.31% [HTML preview] [Download]
- Lowest covered classes
  - com.codename1.io.oidc.OidcClient – 0.00%
  - com.codename1.gpu.GltfLoader – 0.00%
  - com.codename1.ai.OpenAiClient – 0.00%
  - com.codename1.social.Auth0Connect – 0.00%
  - com.codename1.io.grpc.ProtoWriter – 0.00%
  - com.codename1.social.AppleSignIn – 0.00%
  - com.codename1.io.graphql.GraphQLSubscription – 0.00%
  - com.codename1.io.grpc.GrpcWeb – 0.00%
  - com.codename1.nfc.NdefMessage – 0.00%
  - com.codename1.io.grpc.ProtoReader – 0.00%

Static Analysis

SpotBugs [Report archive]
- ✅ ByteCodeTranslator: 0 findings (no issues)
- ✅ android: 0 findings (no issues)
- ✅ codenameone-maven-plugin: 0 findings (no issues)
- ✅ core-unittests: 0 findings (no issues)
- ✅ ios: 0 findings (no issues)
✅ PMD: 0 findings (no issues) [Report archive]
✅ Checkstyle: 0 findings (no issues) [Report archive]

Generated automatically by the PR CI workflow.

shai-almog · 2026-06-11T05:21:52Z

Compared 124 screenshots: 124 matched.
✅ Native iOS screenshot tests passed.

Benchmark Results

VM Translation Time: 0 seconds
Compilation Time: 283 seconds

Build and Run Timing

Metric	Duration
Simulator Boot	71000 ms
Simulator Boot (Run)	1000 ms
App Install	29000 ms
App Launch	37000 ms
Test Execution	373000 ms

Detailed Performance Metrics

Metric	Duration
SIMD kernel backend	SSE2 (x64) / NEON (arm64) native kernels
SIMD int-add (64K x300)	java 166ms / native 4ms = 41.5x speedup
SIMD float-mul (64K x300)	java 97ms / native 5ms = 19.4x speedup
SIMD kernel correctness	PASS (native result == scalar reference)
Base64 payload size	8192 bytes
Base64 benchmark iterations	6000
Base64 SIMD byte path	active (NEON-accelerated)
Base64 CN1 encode	422.000 ms
Base64 CN1 decode	266.000 ms
Base64 native encode	880.000 ms
Base64 encode ratio (CN1/native)	0.480x (52.0% faster)
Base64 native decode	485.000 ms
Base64 decode ratio (CN1/native)	0.548x (45.2% faster)
Base64 SIMD encode	68.000 ms
Base64 encode ratio (SIMD/CN1)	0.161x (83.9% faster)
Base64 SIMD decode	60.000 ms
Base64 decode ratio (SIMD/CN1)	0.226x (77.4% faster)
Base64 encode ratio (SIMD/native)	0.077x (92.3% faster)
Base64 decode ratio (SIMD/native)	0.124x (87.6% faster)
Image encode benchmark iterations	100
Image createMask (SIMD off)	21.000 ms
Image createMask (SIMD on)	1.000 ms
Image createMask ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.048x (95.2% faster)
Image applyMask (SIMD off)	82.000 ms
Image applyMask (SIMD on)	35.000 ms
Image applyMask ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.427x (57.3% faster)
Image modifyAlpha (SIMD off)	74.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha (SIMD on)	46.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.622x (37.8% faster)
Image modifyAlpha removeColor (SIMD off)	83.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha removeColor (SIMD on)	34.000 ms
Image modifyAlpha removeColor ratio (SIMD on/off)	0.410x (59.0% faster)

shai-almog · 2026-06-11T05:32:14Z

Compared 121 screenshots: 121 matched.
✅ JavaScript-port screenshot tests passed.

Fix PMD violations in Printer (final class, stream close, @OverRide)

599e77c

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Add cross-platform printing API (com.codename1.printing)#5217

Add cross-platform printing API (com.codename1.printing)#5217
shai-almog wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
printing-api

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 11, 2026

Uh oh!

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 11, 2026

Uh oh!

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

Conversation

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026

Summary

Port implementations

Verification

Not yet runtime-tested

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

✅ ByteCodeTranslator Quality Report

Test & Coverage

Benchmark Results

Static Analysis

Uh oh!

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Native Android coverage

Native Android coverage

Benchmark Results

Detailed Performance Metrics

Uh oh!

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Benchmark Results

Detailed Performance Metrics

Uh oh!

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Benchmark Results

Detailed Performance Metrics

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 11, 2026

Cloudflare Preview

Uh oh!

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Native Windows port (arm64)

Benchmark Results

Detailed Performance Metrics

Uh oh!

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Benchmark Results

Detailed Performance Metrics

Uh oh!

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Benchmark Results

Build and Run Timing

Detailed Performance Metrics

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 11, 2026

✅ Continuous Quality Report

Test & Coverage

Static Analysis

Uh oh!

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Benchmark Results

Build and Run Timing

Detailed Performance Metrics

Uh oh!

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

github-actions Bot commented Jun 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

shai-almog commented Jun 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading