Disable atomic requests for health-check view

[TheSuperiorStanislav]

Disable atomic requests, because when ATOMIC_REQUEST=True django would
still go to db to check the state, meaning there would an error when db is
not available, which would result in django error 500 page rather than
HealthCheck 500 response.

Note: these endpoints are still dependant on db, if you logged in via
browser, or in other words have session cookies.

[codecov-commenter]

⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.83%. Comparing base (1807ffe) to head (b133384).
⚠️ Report is 103 commits behind head on master.
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #469      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   76.92%   85.83%   +8.90%     
==========================================
  Files          40       61      +21     
  Lines         533     1941    +1408     
  Branches      110        0     -110     
==========================================
+ Hits          410     1666    +1256     
- Misses        115      275     +160     
+ Partials        8        0       -8     

Flag	Coverage Δ
python-3.10-django-4.2	86.51% <100.00%> (?)
python-3.10-django-5.2	96.27% <100.00%> (?)
python-3.11-django-4.2	86.51% <100.00%> (?)
python-3.11-django-5.2	96.27% <100.00%> (?)
python-3.12-django-4.2	86.51% <100.00%> (?)
python-3.12-django-5.2	86.30% <100.00%> (?)
python-3.13-django-4.2	86.51% <100.00%> (?)
python-3.13-django-5.2	86.30% <100.00%> (?)
python-3.9-django-4.2	96.46% <100.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[codingjoe]

Hi @TheSuperiorStanislav 👋,

Thank you for your contribution. I took a look into it, and it didn't work for me just yet. I added a regression test and fixed the implementation.

Furthermore, I will drop the docstring. Documentation is good, but this is rather use case specific, and the behavior is now tested.

Cheers!
Joe