-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
test: add a pull request CI workflow and fix lint issues #21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
markgoddard
commented
Jun 18, 2025
- test: replace exportloopref linter with copyloopvar
- chore: fix issues found by golangci-lint
- test: skip integration tests when run with -short
- test: add a pull request CI workflow and basic Justfile
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @markgoddard, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request primarily focuses on enhancing the project's development workflow by introducing a new CI setup and addressing various linting issues. My aim was to streamline testing, improve code quality, and ensure a more robust development environment.
Highlights
- CI Workflow & Local Tooling: I've introduced a new
Justfileto standardize common development tasks like running tests and linting, and laid the groundwork for a pull request CI workflow. - Linter Configuration Update: I've updated the
golangci-lintconfiguration to replace the deprecatedexportloopreflinter withcopyloopvar, ensuring modern and effective loop variable analysis. - Lint Issue Resolution: I've addressed numerous linting issues across the codebase, primarily focusing on unused return values from
fmt.Fprintfanddefercalls, and simplifying variable declarations. - Integration Test Optimization: I've added logic to skip time-consuming integration tests when the Go test runner is invoked with the
-shortflag, improving local development iteration speed.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces several improvements, including a new CI workflow, updates to the linting configuration by replacing exportloopref with copyloopvar, and various code changes to address linting issues. The Justfile additions provide convenient development shortcuts.
The review focuses on the lint fixes, particularly how errors from Close() methods are handled. While ignoring these errors in deferred calls satisfies linters, it's recommended to log them to aid in diagnostics, especially for client connections and file handles. Other changes, such as skipping integration tests with -short and minor code refactorings, are good improvements.