Open
Conversation
Collaborator
|
is there a reason we want to keep both images? do we want vamOS to support the legacy kernel? |
vamOS System ProfileChanges vs master
Directory size changes (>1MB)
Top 10 Directories
Category Breakdown
Top 10 Packages by Size
|
| File | Size |
|---|---|
| /usr/lib/llvm/21/lib/libLLVM.so.21.1 | 124.3MB |
| /usr/lib/llvm/21/lib/libMLIR.so.21.1 | 89.7MB |
| /usr/lib/llvm/21/bin/mlir-transform-opt | 82.9MB |
| /usr/lib/llvm/21/lib/libclang-cpp.so.21.1 | 56MB |
| /usr/lib/llvm/21/bin/mlir-translate | 53.2MB |
| /usr/lib/llvm/21/bin/llvm-exegesis | 52MB |
| /usr/lib/llvm/21/bin/llvm-bolt-binary-analysis | 50.6MB |
| /usr/local/venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/ffmpeg/install/lib/libavcodec.a | 50.5MB |
| /usr/bin/uv | 46.3MB |
| /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/14.2/gnat1 | 40.1MB |
| /usr/bin/gdb | 38.1MB |
| /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/14.2/cc1plus | 37.3MB |
| /usr/lib/libgallium-25.3.3.so | 35.4MB |
| /usr/lib/libllvm-qcom.so | 35.2MB |
| /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/14.2/cc1 | 35.2MB |
| /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/14.2/lto1 | 33.9MB |
| /usr/bin/lto-dump | 33.9MB |
| /usr/lib/libRusticlOpenCL.so.1.0.0 | 32.5MB |
| /usr/local/venv/bin/ruff | 31.8MB |
| /usr/share/icu/78.2/icudt78l.dat | 31.5MB |
| /usr/lib/llvm/21/lib/libclang.so.21.1.7 | 30.2MB |
| /usr/lib/llvm/21/bin/c-index-test | 28.6MB |
| /usr/local/venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/gcc_arm_none_eabi/toolchain/libexec/gcc/arm-none-eabi/13.2.1/cc1 | 28.2MB |
| /usr/lib/libz3.so | 27.9MB |
| /usr/bin/run | 26.6MB |
| /usr/local/venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/numpy.libs/libscipy_openblas64_-71e1b124.so | 23.6MB |
| /usr/comma/updater | 23.5MB |
| /usr/comma/setup | 23.5MB |
| /usr/comma/reset | 23.5MB |
| /usr/local/uv/python/cpython-3.12.13-linux-aarch64-gnu/bin/python3.12 | 21.6MB |
Contributor
Author
Unless it becomes a hassle, yes. Otherwise, it'll be difficult to disambiguate what's causing bugs when we eventually hit them. It's also unclear how we want to ship these changes (all at once or piecemeal). |
Open
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Continuation of the compressed filesystem experiments from AGNOS (commaai/agnos-builder#438), which halted after experiencing SquashFS instabilities on our old kernel.
Should be stable given how prevalent it is in the Android ecosystem:
NOTE: this only works on mainline. I'll merge this such that it still outputs both an ext4 and erofs image.