feat: add on-demand residency foundation - #490
Draft
schickling-assistant wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
agent-identity: mbp2025.direct.omp.bn5hrz39 agent-persona: generalist agent-supervisor: unavailable agent-tool: OMP agent-tool-version: 18.1.7 agent-runtime: OMP 18.1.7 tooling-profile: dotfiles@4816a7a
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
Agent desired state currently implies continuous process residency. There is no durable model for an agent that remains desired but can be cold between work bursts.
Goal
Add the typed foundation for on-demand residency without changing host orchestration yet.
Decisions
running | suspended | retired) separate from residency policy (always | on-demand).Verification
residency on-demand.cargo check --workspacepasses on the complete stack.Complexity
The large addition is the explicit ledger and transition model. Later PRs consume this model instead of duplicating provider-specific lifecycle state.
Concerns
This PR intentionally does not suspend or wake processes. Host policy arrives in PR #494.
Friction & bottlenecks
None specific to this layer.
Follow-ups
References
Part of stack #495.
Posted on behalf of @schickling
agent_identitysessionagent_personaagent_supervisoragent_toolagent_tool_versionagent_runtimetooling_profile