feat(metrics): add DomainComplianceMetric for regulated industry LLM evaluation#2638
Open
sanianayab wants to merge 2 commits intoconfident-ai:mainfrom
Open
feat(metrics): add DomainComplianceMetric for regulated industry LLM evaluation#2638sanianayab wants to merge 2 commits intoconfident-ai:mainfrom
sanianayab wants to merge 2 commits intoconfident-ai:mainfrom
Conversation
|
@sanianayab is attempting to deploy a commit to the Confident AI Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
This PR introduces
DomainComplianceMetric, a new custom metric for evaluating LLM outputs in regulated industry domains: banking, healthcare, telco, and manufacturing.Motivation
DeepEval's existing metrics (faithfulness, answer relevancy, hallucination) are domain-agnostic. This works well for general LLM apps, but regulated industry deployments face specific failure modes that generic metrics miss:
Standard faithfulness checks may not catch these because the output sounds plausible. Domain-specific evaluation criteria , compliance hedging, no absolute guarantees, regulatory alignment are needed.
The evaluation steps enforce constraint-based binary judgments per compliance dimension, reducing LLM-as-judge stochasticity.
Changes
How It Works
DomainComplianceMetricinherits fromBaseMetricand wraps a domain-specificGEvalinstance with:contextenforcement (raisesValueErrorif context is missing, domain evaluation without context is meaningless)Usage
Supported Domains
bankinghealthcaretelcomanufacturingTesting
deepeval test run tests/test_domain_compliance.pyCovers: compliant outputs (pass), non-compliant outputs (fail), missing context error, invalid domain error, async execution.
Notes
DOMAIN_CRITERIAandDOMAIN_EVALUATION_STEPS