Skip to content

Conversation

@henkbirkholz
Copy link
Member

fixes #27

Copy link
Collaborator

@TheBankster TheBankster left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just like our discussion about finer points of Provenance belongs in the Reference Architecture and not in the WIMSE I-D, I think this has the same exact properties. WIMSE says VERY LITTLE about how the credential is built, and while this is important to cover for TWI, it is likely to derail our efforts to have WIMSE consider the very few credential-usage-specific extensions we are asking for. I think this PR needs to be rejected but the content preserved and moved to our Reference Architecture.

Copy link
Collaborator

@TheBankster TheBankster left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I moved the content of this PR into the Reference Architecture document in our Google Drive. You can delete this PR now as it does not belong in the WIMSE WG.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add Binding to Platform Content

3 participants