Implement CRI ListPodSandboxMetrics#10691
Conversation
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
2981bb8 to
3b7a1b7
Compare
e07f859 to
55a5d80
Compare
|
/cc @mikebrow |
b0830f6 to
44e5695
Compare
|
@akhilerm You still working on this? |
Yepp. I am working on it. Couldnt focus for sometime, but will pickup from next week onwards. |
|
/cc @zvonkok |
|
@zvonkok: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: zvonkok. Note that only containerd members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@akhilerm Is this still on your roadmap? |
|
AFAIC some metrics are missing if we want to be on par with cAdvisor. |
Yes
The |
44e5695 to
0b4a872
Compare
|
@akhilerm I mostly referring to this table: https://github.com/google/cadvisor/blob/master/docs/storage/prometheus.md AFAIR the FS were missing? |
0b4a872 to
41203bc
Compare
|
This is the e2e test which metrics we will need: kubernetes/kubernetes#126213 |
Signed-off-by: Akhil Mohan <akhilerm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Akhil Mohan <akhilerm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Akhil Mohan <akhilerm@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Akhil Mohan <akhilerm@gmail.com>
c5d36b1 to
a418e28
Compare
|
A few more additional metrics will be added as mentioned in kubernetes-sigs/cri-tools#1931 for the conformance |
|
@akhilerm could you pls create a follow up issue to address #10691 (comment) |
Implement the following CRI APIs
Fixes: #10506
TESTING
crictl metricspcommand can be used to test the pod sandbox metrics returned by the runtime.Output
Ref: https://gist.github.com/akhilerm/625d12b805d482cd577311be3a4f7551
Part of kubernetes/enhancements#2371