-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 866
Add a link to project governance and MAINTAINERS file #6108
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a link to project governance and MAINTAINERS file #6108
Conversation
OWNERS
Outdated
| - mheon | ||
| - vrothberg | ||
| - Luap99 | ||
| - mtrmac |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the reviewers list supposed to include some, all, or none of the approvers list? Looking at podman's main branch, I see one approver who is not also a reviewer, so I don't know if there's a rule here
I think both lists were previously kept sorted.
|
@baude is the best source for that, but I think you need to be in both to get full privileges |
Luap99
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I noticed the Maintainer file error is also in the podman one so I did a PR there containers/podman#25820
MAINTAINERS.md
Outdated
| | Ashley Cui | [ashley-cui](https://github.com/ashley-cui) | Reviewer | [Red Hat](https://github.com/RedHatOfficial) | | ||
| | Nalin Dahyabhai | [nalind](https://github.com/nalind) | Core Maintainer | [Red Hat](https://github.com/RedHatOfficial) | | ||
| | Matthew Heon | [mheon](https://github.com/mheon) | Core Maintainer | [Red Hat](https://github.com/RedHatOfficial) | | ||
| | Paul Holzinger | [luap99](https://github.com/Luap99) | Core Maintainer | [Red Hat](https://github.com/RedHatOfficial) | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: my github nick has a upper case L
MAINTAINERS.md
Outdated
| | Lokesh Mandvekar | [lsm5](https://github.com/lsm5) | Maintainer | [Red Hat](https://github.com/RedHatOfficial) | | ||
| | Urvashi Mohnani | [umohnani8](https://github.com/umohnani8) | Maintainer | [Red Hat](https://github.com/RedHatOfficial) | | ||
| | Aditya Rajan | [flouthoc](https://github.com/flouthoc) | Reviewer | [Red Hat](https://github.com/RedHatOfficial) | | ||
| | Jan Rodák | [honny1](https://github.com/Honny1) | Reviewer | [Red Hat](https://github.com/RedHatOfficial) | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same for Honny1
OWNERS
Outdated
| - mheon | ||
| - vrothberg | ||
| - Luap99 | ||
| - mtrmac |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not sure if it matters but this is missing a final newline
ee005ce to
9fb55df
Compare
|
Ephemeral COPR build failed. @containers/packit-build please check. |
9fb55df to
e13d0e3
Compare
|
The MAINTAINERS.md and OWNERS don't currently agree on |
e13d0e3 to
4c5a664
Compare
nalind
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks!
Luap99
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
giuseppe
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe, Luap99, mheon, nalind The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
The MAINTAINERS file is based on the current OWNERS file. I added our core maintainers as they are expected to have commit bits on all project repositories. The existing MAINTAINERS file, which appears out of date, was removed in favor of the new one (which has all CNCF mandated information). Signed-off-by: Matt Heon <[email protected]>
4c5a664 to
53cd313
Compare
|
LGTM |
|
/lgtm |
2de361a
into
containers:main
The MAINTAINERS file is based on the current OWNERS file. I added our core maintainers as they are expected to have commit bits on all project repositories.
The existing MAINTAINERS file, which appears out of date, was removed in favor of the new one (which has all CNCF mandated information).
What type of PR is this?
/kind other
What this PR does / why we need it:
Administrative work to link to the new governance model and add a CNCF-compliant maintainers list
How to verify it
N/A
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
N/A
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?