Summary
The JSON body processor (internal/bodyprocessors/json.go) can be made to
crash the whole process with an unrecoverable fatal error: stack overflow,
using a request body that is well under the recommended SecRequestBodyLimit
and the default SecArgumentsLimit.
Root cause
readJSON (json.go:113-143) runs a bounded, best-effort flattening walk
(readItems) and afterwards calls gjson.Valid(s) on the raw body if
readItems returned no error:
json := gjson.Parse(s)
...
truncated, err = readItems(json, key, maxRecursion, argumentLimit, byteBudget, &usedBytes, &argCount, res)
if err != nil {
return res, truncated, err
}
if !gjson.Valid(s) {
return res, truncated, errors.New("invalid JSON")
}
gjson.Valid (gjson v1.18.0, validany -> validarray/validobject) recurses
once per nesting level with no depth bound. readItems does have a depth
bound (maxRecursion), enforced here (json.go:163-182):
func readItems(json gjson.Result, objKey []byte, maxRecursion int, argumentLimit int, byteBudget int, usedBytes *int, argCount *int, res map[string][]string) (truncated bool, err error) {
if byteBudget > 0 && *usedBytes >= byteBudget {
return true, nil // <-- checked first
}
if argumentLimit > 0 && *argCount >= argumentLimit {
return true, nil // <-- checked second
}
...
if maxRecursion <= 0 {
return false, errors.New("max recursion reached while reading json object")
}
The byte-budget and argument-limit checks run before the recursion-depth
check, and they short-circuit the walk with truncated=true, err=nil instead
of recursing further. If the configured SecArgumentsLimit
(ArgumentLimit, default 1000, internal/corazawaf/waf.go:359) is reached by
earlier, shallow values in the document, readItems stops walking before it
ever reaches a deeply nested tail later in the same document — so the
maxRecursion error is never produced, err comes back nil, and readJSON
falls through to the unconditional gjson.Valid(s) call on the complete raw
body, including the part readItems never visited.
This is not a new interaction with the recursion limit itself: at v3.7.0,
gjson.Valid ran unconditionally before any recursion check at all, so a
plain deeply-nested body crashed the process directly. A later fix added a
depth check that returns an error before Valid runs for the straightforward
case (nesting reached before any other guard fires). The argument-limit /
byte-budget guards added since then (GHSA-6r3q-mjv7-xr8m,
GHSA-3ww9-vw83-9w5x) reopened the same crash for the case above, because they
short-circuit the walk (and therefore the recursion counter) ahead of the
depth check, on both the request and response body path (ProcessResponse
calls the same readJSON, json.go:57-88).
Because this is fatal error: stack overflow, not a panic, it is not
recoverable by any recover() in the calling goroutine — the process
terminates unconditionally.
PoC
package bodyprocessors
import (
"strings"
"testing"
)
func TestStackOverflowRepro(t *testing.T) {
body := "[" + strings.Repeat("1,", 1000) + strings.Repeat("[", 13_000_000)
// 13,002,001 bytes total: under the recommended SecRequestBodyLimit
// (13107200, coraza.conf-recommended:78) and default ArgumentLimit (1000,
// internal/corazawaf/waf.go:359).
_, _, _ = readJSON(body, 20, 1000)
}
$ go test -run TestStackOverflowRepro ./internal/bodyprocessors/ -v
runtime: goroutine stack exceeds 1000000000-byte limit
fatal error: stack overflow
...
github.com/tidwall/gjson.validarray(...)
.../gjson@v1.18.0/gjson.go:2584
github.com/tidwall/gjson.validany(...)
.../gjson@v1.18.0/gjson.go:2499
github.com/tidwall/gjson.validarray(...)
.../gjson@v1.18.0/gjson.go:2589
... (repeats until the goroutine stack limit is hit)
Reproduced against commit 19b86824 (tag v3.8.0), both by calling
readJSON directly and end-to-end through the recommended
coraza.conf-recommended configuration (JSON Content-Type, default
SecArgumentsLimit, recommended SecRequestBodyLimit).
Impact
An unauthenticated attacker who can send an HTTP request body (any endpoint
protected by Coraza with the JSON body processor enabled, which is the
default for application/json) can crash the entire host process with a
single request, using a payload well within default and recommended body
size and argument-count limits. There is no privilege or interaction
requirement, and the crash cannot be caught or mitigated by the integrator
(no recover() stops a stack-overflow fatal error). This is strictly worse
than a CPU-exhaustion or slow-request DoS: the process must be restarted, and
every in-flight request/transaction on that process is lost.
Suggested fix
Run an iterative, explicitly-bounded-depth pre-scan (or reuse readItems's
own recursion accounting) before calling gjson.Valid, and never call
gjson.Valid on input whose nesting exceeds maxRecursion. The response
path (ProcessResponse) needs the same treatment since it shares readJSON.
AI involvement disclosure
- AI tools/models used: Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic), via Claude Code.
- What was generated/assisted: the initial vulnerability hypothesis and
repro shape were supplied by the reporter as an existing written finding;
Claude Sonnet 5 independently re-derived the root cause by reading the
current source, wrote and ran a fresh PoC test against commit 19b86824
(tag v3.8.0), confirmed the crash and stack trace shown above, verified
the default configuration values cited (ArgumentLimit default,
SecRequestBodyLimit recommended value) against the current source, and
drafted this advisory text.
- Review performed: reproduced by hand by running the PoC test above with
go test -run TestStackOverflowRepro ./internal/bodyprocessors/ -v against
a clean checkout of commit 19b86824; observed the fatal error: stack overflow and stack trace through gjson.validarray/validany; traced
readJSON/readItems line by line to confirm the guard ordering described
above; the PoC was reviewed by a human maintainer (fzipi) before
submission of this advisory.
Summary
The JSON body processor (
internal/bodyprocessors/json.go) can be made tocrash the whole process with an unrecoverable
fatal error: stack overflow,using a request body that is well under the recommended
SecRequestBodyLimitand the default
SecArgumentsLimit.Root cause
readJSON(json.go:113-143) runs a bounded, best-effort flattening walk(
readItems) and afterwards callsgjson.Valid(s)on the raw body ifreadItemsreturned no error:gjson.Valid(gjson v1.18.0,validany->validarray/validobject) recursesonce per nesting level with no depth bound.
readItemsdoes have a depthbound (
maxRecursion), enforced here (json.go:163-182):The byte-budget and argument-limit checks run before the recursion-depth
check, and they short-circuit the walk with
truncated=true, err=nilinsteadof recursing further. If the configured
SecArgumentsLimit(
ArgumentLimit, default 1000,internal/corazawaf/waf.go:359) is reached byearlier, shallow values in the document,
readItemsstops walking before itever reaches a deeply nested tail later in the same document — so the
maxRecursionerror is never produced,errcomes backnil, andreadJSONfalls through to the unconditional
gjson.Valid(s)call on the complete rawbody, including the part
readItemsnever visited.This is not a new interaction with the recursion limit itself: at v3.7.0,
gjson.Validran unconditionally before any recursion check at all, so aplain deeply-nested body crashed the process directly. A later fix added a
depth check that returns an error before
Validruns for the straightforwardcase (nesting reached before any other guard fires). The argument-limit /
byte-budget guards added since then (GHSA-6r3q-mjv7-xr8m,
GHSA-3ww9-vw83-9w5x) reopened the same crash for the case above, because they
short-circuit the walk (and therefore the recursion counter) ahead of the
depth check, on both the request and response body path (
ProcessResponsecalls the same
readJSON, json.go:57-88).Because this is
fatal error: stack overflow, not apanic, it is notrecoverable by any
recover()in the calling goroutine — the processterminates unconditionally.
PoC
Reproduced against commit
19b86824(tagv3.8.0), both by callingreadJSONdirectly and end-to-end through the recommendedcoraza.conf-recommendedconfiguration (JSONContent-Type, defaultSecArgumentsLimit, recommendedSecRequestBodyLimit).Impact
An unauthenticated attacker who can send an HTTP request body (any endpoint
protected by Coraza with the JSON body processor enabled, which is the
default for
application/json) can crash the entire host process with asingle request, using a payload well within default and recommended body
size and argument-count limits. There is no privilege or interaction
requirement, and the crash cannot be caught or mitigated by the integrator
(no
recover()stops a stack-overflow fatal error). This is strictly worsethan a CPU-exhaustion or slow-request DoS: the process must be restarted, and
every in-flight request/transaction on that process is lost.
Suggested fix
Run an iterative, explicitly-bounded-depth pre-scan (or reuse
readItems'sown recursion accounting) before calling
gjson.Valid, and never callgjson.Validon input whose nesting exceedsmaxRecursion. The responsepath (
ProcessResponse) needs the same treatment since it sharesreadJSON.AI involvement disclosure
repro shape were supplied by the reporter as an existing written finding;
Claude Sonnet 5 independently re-derived the root cause by reading the
current source, wrote and ran a fresh PoC test against commit
19b86824(tag
v3.8.0), confirmed the crash and stack trace shown above, verifiedthe default configuration values cited (
ArgumentLimitdefault,SecRequestBodyLimitrecommended value) against the current source, anddrafted this advisory text.
go test -run TestStackOverflowRepro ./internal/bodyprocessors/ -vagainsta clean checkout of commit
19b86824; observed thefatal error: stack overflowand stack trace throughgjson.validarray/validany; tracedreadJSON/readItemsline by line to confirm the guard ordering describedabove; the PoC was reviewed by a human maintainer (fzipi) before
submission of this advisory.