Skip to content

Conversation

@jaramyweb3
Copy link
Contributor

@jaramyweb3 jaramyweb3 commented Aug 5, 2025

Description

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Corrected formatting and improved clarity in changelog and README files.
    • Fixed grammatical errors and improved comment clarity across multiple modules.
    • Updated CLI usage examples for better accuracy and readability.
    • No changes to functionality or user-facing behavior.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 5, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This update makes minor textual corrections to comments and documentation across several modules. Changes include fixing grammatical errors, clarifying command usage examples, correcting comment descriptions, and updating changelog formatting. No functional, logic, or control flow changes are introduced, and no exported or public entities are altered.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Changelog Formatting
x/evidence/CHANGELOG.md
Fixed pull request reference formatting in the changelog entry by adding a hash symbol.
CLI Documentation
x/evidence/README.md
Corrected CLI usage example by removing redundant command word.
Comment Correction: Evidence Router
x/evidence/types/router.go
Updated comment to refer to "evidence handler" instead of "governance handler."
Comment Correction: Feegrant Errors
x/feegrant/errors.go
Changed comment to correctly refer to "feegrant errors" instead of "governance errors."
Grammar Fix: Genutil README
x/genutil/README.md
Fixed verb agreement in a sentence describing application genesis.
Comment Clarification: CLI Prompt
x/gov/client/cli/prompt.go
Improved comment clarity and grammar describing struct field iteration logic.
Comment Correction: CLI Prompt Test
x/gov/client/cli/prompt_test.go
Clarified comment about integer range in test function.
Comment Correction: Gov Keeper Test
x/gov/keeper/common_test.go
Fixed typo in comment, correcting "MegServiceRouter" to "MsgServiceRouter."

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
x/evidence/README.md (1)

274-283: Still one leftover double-word in the example command
Line 274 correctly shows simd query evidence [flags], but the example directly below (Line 282) still uses the old duplicated form:

simd query evidence evidence "<hash>"

Consider updating the example for consistency:

-simd query evidence evidence "DF0C23E8634E480F84B9D5674A7CDC9816466DEC28A3358F73260F68D28D7660"
+simd query evidence "DF0C23E8634E480F84B9D5674A7CDC9816466DEC28A3358F73260F68D28D7660"
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to Reviews > Disable Knowledge Base setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0290439 and 2e596f3.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • x/evidence/CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • x/evidence/README.md (1 hunks)
  • x/evidence/types/router.go (1 hunks)
  • x/feegrant/errors.go (1 hunks)
  • x/genutil/README.md (1 hunks)
  • x/gov/client/cli/prompt.go (1 hunks)
  • x/gov/client/cli/prompt_test.go (1 hunks)
  • x/gov/keeper/common_test.go (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (7)
x/gov/keeper/common_test.go (1)

113-117: Comment typo correctly fixed – nothing else to address
The replacement of “MegServiceRouter” with “MsgServiceRouter” clarifies the comment and matches the actual type name. No functional code is touched.

x/feegrant/errors.go (1)

5-6: Header now accurately reflects the module
Changing “governance” → “feegrant” aligns the comment with the surrounding code.

x/evidence/types/router.go (1)

54-56: Correct handler description – looks good
Replacing “governance handler” with “evidence handler” removes the stray reference and improves accuracy.

x/evidence/CHANGELOG.md (1)

41-42: Fixed PR-link formatting – OK
Adding the leading # produces the intended markdown link and keeps style consistent with the rest of the changelog.

x/genutil/README.md (1)

19-19: Grammar correction approved.

The change from "consist" to "consists" correctly fixes the subject-verb agreement, as "genesis" is singular and requires the singular verb form.

x/gov/client/cli/prompt.go (1)

68-68: Comment clarity improvement approved.

Adding the article "a" before "slice" improves the grammatical correctness and readability of the comment describing the field skipping logic.

x/gov/client/cli/prompt_test.go (1)

62-62: Comment completion approved.

Adding "int." completes the sentence and clarifies that the test is specifically checking values outside the range of the int type, which aligns with the test's purpose of validating integer parsing.

@aljo242 aljo242 enabled auto-merge August 5, 2025 16:06
@aljo242 aljo242 added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 5, 2025
Merged via the queue into cosmos:main with commit 8e370f8 Aug 5, 2025
43 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants