Skip to content

Conversation

@avorylli
Copy link
Contributor

@avorylli avorylli commented Sep 1, 2025

Improve x/consensus README.md with:

  • Clear module overview and purpose
  • Detailed parameter descriptions
  • Usage examples with code snippets
  • Architecture and security information
  • Better structure for contributors and users

This makes the module more discoverable and easier to understand
for developers working with consensus parameters.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Expanded README with an on-chain governance overview for updating consensus parameters.
    • Clarified parameter categories (Block, Evidence, Validator, ABCI) and their configurable fields.
    • Added step-by-step examples for submitting parameter update proposals and querying current parameters.
    • Included high-level architecture and security considerations, covering authorization, validation, and governance approval.
    • Documentation-only change; no code or API modifications.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 1, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Documentation-only update: expanded x/consensus README from a single-line description to a detailed, governance-focused guide covering parameter categories, usage (MsgUpdateParams), queries, architecture components, and security constraints. No code or API changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of Changes
Docs: Governance-focused consensus params README
x/consensus/README.md
Rewrote README to detail on-chain governance updates for consensus parameters (Block, Evidence, Validator, ABCI), usage example (MsgUpdateParams), parameter query, architecture (Keeper/Types/Module), and security constraints. No code changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
x/consensus/README.md (3)

36-38: Add ABCI param example (VoteExtensionsEnableHeight).

Since ABCI params are documented above, include them in the usage snippet for completeness.

     Validator: &types.ValidatorParams{
         PubKeyTypes: []string{"ed25519"},
     },
+    Abci: &types.ABCIParams{
+        VoteExtensionsEnableHeight: 123456,
+    },

Also applies to: 45-61


28-33: Document cross-constraint: Evidence.MaxBytes must not exceed Block.MaxBytes.

Prevents invalid configurations.

 - `MaxBytes`: Maximum evidence size in bytes
+
+> Note: Evidence.MaxBytes must be ≤ Block.MaxBytes.

79-82: Grammar nit.

- - Updates are subject to governance approval process
+ - Updates are subject to the governance approval process.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Knowledge Base: Disabled due to Reviews > Disable Knowledge Base setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b6b58e4 and c3f4377.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • x/consensus/README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
x/consensus/README.md

[grammar] ~25-~25: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ... MaxBytes: Maximum block size in bytes - MaxGas: Maximum gas per block ### Evidence Pa...

(QB_NEW_EN)


[grammar] ~29-~29: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...ocks: Maximum age of evidence in blocks - MaxAgeDuration: Maximum age of evidence in time - Max...

(QB_NEW_EN)


[grammar] ~30-~30: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...ration: Maximum age of evidence in time - MaxBytes`: Maximum evidence size in bytes ### Va...

(QB_NEW_EN)


[grammar] ~73-~73: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...Manages parameter storage and validation - Types: Defines message types and param...

(QB_NEW_EN)


[grammar] ~74-~74: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...s message types and parameter structures - Module: Integrates with the Cosmos SDK...

(QB_NEW_EN)


[grammar] ~81-~81: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...efore application - Updates are subject to governance approval process

(QB_NEW_EN)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Summary

@aljo242
Copy link
Contributor

aljo242 commented Sep 2, 2025

@technicallyty to review when he returns

Copy link
Contributor

@technicallyty technicallyty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think we should apply most of the coderrabbit's suggestions

@avorylli avorylli requested a review from technicallyty October 8, 2025 16:16
Copy link
Contributor

@technicallyty technicallyty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

one more thing then should be good to go

@avorylli avorylli requested a review from technicallyty October 8, 2025 17:20
Copy link
Contributor

@technicallyty technicallyty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

awesome thank you

@technicallyty technicallyty added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 8, 2025
Merged via the queue into cosmos:main with commit bdac963 Oct 8, 2025
36 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants