-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
doc: refine gas_rebates.md content for clarity #556
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Removed redundant sentence about MEV Blocker processing transactions.
|
@glokos is attempting to deploy a commit to the cow Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughDocumentation sentence in the gas rebates conceptual guide was replaced: the previous claim about processing ~10% of daily Ethereum transactions was removed and replaced with a statement that MEV Blocker operates the only permissionless Order Flow Auction binding searchers and builders to public rules. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/mevblocker/concepts/gas_rebates.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: 2025-06-30T14:12:14.869Z
Learnt from: pretf00d
Repo: cowprotocol/docs PR: 512
File: docs/mevblocker/concepts/gas_rebates.md:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-06-30T14:12:14.869Z
Learning: When referring to MEV Blocker or other products/services in documentation, use "that" instead of "who" as the relative pronoun (e.g., "MEV Blocker is the only RPC that has..." not "MEV Blocker is the only RPC who has...") because products are not people.
Applied to files:
docs/mevblocker/concepts/gas_rebates.md
pretf00d
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One small lower case issue to address.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary by CodeRabbit