Skip to content

Conversation

@Inventhrice
Copy link

This is the work I've done so far for the documentation! Let me know your thoughts :)

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 17, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 18, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 81.00%. Comparing base (bce38f0) to head (cf92423).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #579      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   79.69%   81.00%   +1.31%     
==========================================
  Files         137      137              
  Lines       13467    11083    -2384     
==========================================
- Hits        10732     8977    -1755     
+ Misses       2310     1680     -630     
- Partials      425      426       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 81.00% <ø> (+1.31%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@creativeprojects
Copy link
Owner

I'll have a look at it during the week or at the week-end, thank you for your help 👍🏻

@Inventhrice
Copy link
Author

Just wanted to bump this to bring to your attention! Lemme know if the direction this is heading at is looking good!

@creativeprojects
Copy link
Owner

Hi!

I finally got a bit of time to look at it.
I can see the reorganisation of the chapters makes sense to me, that's nice, thank you 👍🏻

Sadly I can't try to view the result locally, I get an error on building it with Hugo:

ERROR [en] REF_NOT_FOUND: Ref "/reference/jsonschema": "/go/src/github.com/creativeprojects/resticprofile/docs/content/configuration/profiles/editorConfig.md:7:64": page not found

Are you using a different version of Hugo by any chance?

@Inventhrice
Copy link
Author

Ah! I see what's happened. To explain:

  1. "/reference/jsonschema" wasn't found in /docs/content/configuration/profiles/editorConfig.md:7:64
  2. Checking my repo, /docs/content/reference is empty

This is different than my working version, which has the following under the same dir:
image

I've pushed a change that just updates the link, it should be good!

@creativeprojects
Copy link
Owner

Cool I can browse the doc locally, it's easier to see that way 👍🏻
I'm not too sure why the pipeline is failing: it works when I run the script to check all the links locally (via make checklinks)

@Inventhrice
Copy link
Author

Build looks to be failing at the check broken links, which makes sense/is to be expected (seeing as the update to the docs would move a lot of the links around)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants