Fix SSL certificate verification error in CLI when creating a new crew project

[devin-ai-integration]

Fix SSL certificate verification error in CLI when creating a new crew project

Description

This PR fixes issue #2811 where users on Windows 11 (and potentially other systems) encounter SSL certificate verification errors when trying to create a new crew project using the crewai create crew <projectname> command.

The error occurs when trying to fetch provider data from raw.githubusercontent.com with the error message: "certificate verify failed: unable to get local issuer certificate".

Changes

• Modified the fetch_provider_data function in provider.py to handle SSL certificate verification errors gracefully
• Added a fallback mechanism that first tries with SSL verification enabled (default behavior)
• If that fails with an SSLError, it retries without verification while warning the user about the security implications
• Added tests to verify both the normal case and the fallback mechanism work correctly

Testing

• Added unit tests that verify the fix works correctly
• Manually tested the fix by simulating SSL errors and verifying the fallback mechanism works

Link to Devin run

https://app.devin.ai/sessions/61f2dd07c5d34a97a76804b10371ea53

Requested by: Joe Moura ([email protected])

[devin-ai-integration]

🤖 Devin AI Engineer

I'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know:

✅ I will automatically:

• Address comments on this PR. Add '(aside)' to your comment to have me ignore it.
• Look at CI failures and help fix them

Note: I can only respond to comments from users who have write access to this repository.

⚙️ Control Options:

• Disable automatic comment and CI monitoring

[joaomdmoura]

Disclaimer: This review was made by a crew of AI Agents.

Code Review Comment for PR #2812

Overview

This PR addresses SSL certificate verification errors in the CLI when creating new crew projects by introducing a fallback mechanism for when SSL verification fails. This approach enhances user experience but raises security considerations that need to be addressed.

File Analysis

1. src/crewai/cli/provider.py

Positive Aspects

• The PR features a well-structured error handling strategy that catches specific exceptions.
• User feedback is effectively communicated through the use of click.secho.
• The implementation maintains backward compatibility, thus ensuring that existing users are not adversely affected.

Suggestions for Improvement

1. Security Warning Documentation
   Ensure that any functions that bypass SSL verification clearly document the implications:

   """
   Warning: This function includes a fallback that disables SSL verification.
   This should only be used in development environments or when absolutely necessary.
   Production deployments should resolve SSL certificate issues properly.
   """

2. Environment Variable Control
   Rather than a hardcoded fallback, allowing developers to bypass SSL via an environment variable enhances flexibility:

   import os
   allow_insecure = os.getenv('CREW_ALLOW_INSECURE_SSL', 'false').lower() == 'true'

3. Logging Enhancements
   Implement logging to track SSL failures. This is vital for debugging:

   import logging
   logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)

2. tests/cli/provider_test.py

Positive Aspects

• The test coverage for both success and error scenarios is commendable and crucial for robustness.
• Effective use of mocking ensures that tests are not dependent on external systems.

Suggestions for Additional Test Cases

1. Test for Empty JSON Response
   Adding checks for edge cases will improve robustness:

   @mock.patch("crewai.cli.provider.requests.get")
   def test_fetch_provider_data_with_empty_response(self, mock_get):
       ...

2. SSL Environment Variable Tests
   Testing functionality with various environment variables ensures robustness against configuration issues:

   @mock.patch.dict(os.environ, {'CREW_ALLOW_INSECURE_SSL': 'false'})
   ...

General Recommendations

• Security Documentation: Ensure proper documentation in README.md, emphasizing the implications of ignoring SSL verification.
• Error Handling: Consider implementing a retry mechanism with exponential backoff and adding timeout configurations.
• Code Structure: Refactor network handling into a dedicated class might improve maintainability. Adding type hints is also advisable for better readability and code comprehension.
• Testing: Incorporating integration tests and loading tests will further bolster the dependability of the fetching logic.

Impact Analysis

• Security: The new behavior introduces medium impact risks due to SSL verification bypass.
• Performance: Changes are expected to have minimal impact on performance.
• Maintainability: Improvement is noted due to enhanced error handling and testing coverage.
• User Experience: Users now have improved feedback on SSL issues, which is crucial for troubleshooting.

Final Verdict

The changes implemented in this PR are generally well-structured but require the addition of security measures and thorough documentation. Once these concerns are addressed, the PR should be approved.