chore(deps): bump upjet dependency to crossplane-v2 branch#1756
Merged
jbw976 merged 1 commit intocrossplane-contrib:crossplane-v2from Mar 26, 2025
Merged
chore(deps): bump upjet dependency to crossplane-v2 branch#1756jbw976 merged 1 commit intocrossplane-contrib:crossplane-v2from
jbw976 merged 1 commit intocrossplane-contrib:crossplane-v2from
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Jared Watts <jbw976@gmail.com>
negz
approved these changes
Mar 26, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of your changes
This is a small follow-up PR to #1753 to bump the upjet dependency to the latest in its crossplane-v2 branch, now that upjet PR crossplane/upjet#480 has been merged.
I have:
make reviewableto ensure this PR is ready for review.How has this code been tested
I've manually run
make generateand saw no difference in functionality, which isn't surprising because this is effectively the same upjet code we'd been testing all along in #1753 😁