Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move checksum to a dedicated file #94

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Amxx
Copy link

@Amxx Amxx commented Mar 20, 2025

It is usually preferable to separate concerns. In particular, checksum are critical security values that should not be mixed up with the rest of the installation logic.

This is targetting #93

@Amxx Amxx requested a review from elopez as a code owner March 20, 2025 09:16
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Mar 20, 2025

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@elopez elopez force-pushed the dev-foundrup-update branch from d86660f to 3eef552 Compare March 21, 2025 22:48
Copy link
Member

@elopez elopez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR! I've left you some comments inline -- I like the general idea, but there's some issues that should be resolved before we can move forward.

entrypoint.sh Outdated
@@ -135,7 +135,8 @@ install_node()
fi

wget -q -O nvm-install.sh https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nvm-sh/nvm/v0.39.1/install.sh
if [ ! "fabc489b39a5e9c999c7cab4d281cdbbcbad10ec2f8b9a7f7144ad701b6bfdc7 nvm-install.sh" = "$(sha256sum nvm-install.sh)" ]; then
sha256sum -c checksum --status --strict --ignore-missing
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if this returns non-zero (i.e mismatched checksum), the execution will stop then because the script is run with set -e and the user won't see the error message from below.

I believe you should be able to do if ! sha256sum .....; then ... instead to have it working.

I am also not a fan of --ignore-missing, as it could be error prone. If, for instance, the filename changes, the check may still pass silently, leaving the user unprotected. We could have two separate checksum files to avoid having to use --ignore-missing

Copy link
Author

@Amxx Amxx Mar 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this the new syntax (with the grep) look good ?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, thanks!

@Amxx Amxx changed the base branch from dev-foundrup-update to main March 26, 2025 10:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants