Fixed log printing, fixed authorization combination and added kubernetes functional test#2
Fixed log printing, fixed authorization combination and added kubernetes functional test#2
Conversation
…tes functional test
|
/gemini review |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @ctyano, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request significantly enhances the development and testing experience by integrating a robust Kubernetes functional testing suite. It introduces new Makefile targets that automate the setup and teardown of a local Kubernetes environment, along with certificate generation and deployment of authorization components. Additionally, it includes minor but important fixes to logging within the authorization logic, improving the clarity of debug messages for easier debugging and understanding.
Highlights
- Improved Logging Readability: Updated log formatting in authorization-related Go files to use
%qinstead of%#vfor printing string slices and structs, enhancing the clarity of debug messages. - Comprehensive Kubernetes Functional Tests: Introduced a new suite of Makefile targets to streamline the setup, deployment, and testing of Kubernetes authorization components. This includes creating a Kind cluster, loading Docker images, generating certificates, deploying manifests, and running an Envoy-based authorization test.
- Makefile Enhancements for Development Workflow: Refined the
pathmaninstallation logic for better robustness and added numerous new targets to the Makefile, facilitating local Kubernetes environment management and Docker image handling for development and testing.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces significant changes to the Makefile, adding support for Kubernetes functional tests using kind, certificate generation, and improved dependency installation. It also includes minor fixes to log message formatting in the Go source files. My review focuses on the Makefile changes, where I've identified several critical and high-severity issues, including incorrect path handling, undefined dependencies, and commands that may fail in CI environments. I've provided suggestions to fix these issues to ensure the new automation works reliably.
|
/gemini review |
ctyano
changed the title
1 participant
Type of changes
Choose one of the below, or leave them empty: