Skip to content

Prevent double-definitions of propositions#488

Merged
UnsignedByte merged 4 commits intomainfrom
cvc5-fix
Jan 25, 2025
Merged

Prevent double-definitions of propositions#488
UnsignedByte merged 4 commits intomainfrom
cvc5-fix

Conversation

@UnsignedByte
Copy link
Collaborator

@UnsignedByte UnsignedByte commented Jan 24, 2025

Fixes #487

Also splits check tests into cvc5 and z3 to prevent things like this from occurring again. The existing if-expr test already checks this but was just never run on cvc5.

Copy link
Member

@rachitnigam rachitnigam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@UnsignedByte UnsignedByte merged commit b13ba6f into main Jan 25, 2025
4 checks passed
@UnsignedByte UnsignedByte deleted the cvc5-fix branch January 25, 2025 17:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Propositions used in expressions are defined twice in discharge

2 participants