Skip to content

docs: clarify demonstrative pronouns and improve narrative flow - #1166

Open
dem-extra1 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
jules-9445860666080117141-66c72038
Open

docs: clarify demonstrative pronouns and improve narrative flow#1166
dem-extra1 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
jules-9445860666080117141-66c72038

Conversation

@dem-extra1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Clarify demonstrative pronouns across subfiles by replacing bare demonstratives with explicit noun phrases to improve narrative flow and precision.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 9445860666080117141 started by @dem-extra1

Co-authored-by: dem-extra1 <112029334+dem-extra1@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Claude finished reviewView run


Review: PR #1166 — docs: clarify demonstrative pronouns and improve narrative flow

Scope: purely prose edits across 4 subfiles, replacing bare "This"/"That" with an explicit noun phrase, directly implementing the CLAUDE.md rule: "Always add a noun phrase after 'This', 'That', and 'Those' to clarify the referent." No math, code, or config changes.

Per-file check

  • _subfiles/Linear-models-overview/_exr-linreg-rescaling.qmd:10 — "This includes the intercept" → "These affected parameters include the intercept". Correct referent (coefficients affected by the interaction), grammatically sound with the following list.
  • _subfiles/Linear-models-overview/_sec_hers_lm_diagnostics_lm2.qmd:23 — "This previews…" → "This similarity previews…". Correctly refers back to the near-identical residual/QQ plots described in the preceding sentence.
  • _subfiles/Linear-models-overview/_sec_linreg_model_selection.qmd:36 — "That helps us decide…" → "That structure helps us decide…". Correctly refers to the DAG's encoded time-ordering/causal structure from the prior sentence.
  • _subfiles/proportional-hazards-models/_sec-competing-risks.qmd:49 — "This overestimates…" → "This naive Kaplan-Meier approach overestimates…". Correct referent. Minor optional nit: "naive" is now used in two consecutive sentences ("A naive approach treats..." / "This naive Kaplan-Meier approach overestimates...") — slightly repetitive, but not incorrect or ambiguous; not blocking.

Other checks

  • No math was added or changed, so there's nothing to verify against latex-macros/macros.qmd (submodule present at latex-macros/, confirmed via .gitmodules) — no macro simplification or new-macro candidates apply to this diff.
  • No hallucination risk: no new function/API/citation/URL references introduced.
  • No structural/_quarto-*.yml changes, no subfiles added, no heading rule implications.
  • One-source-line-per-phrase convention preserved on every changed line.
  • No prior Claude review exists on this PR (only the Jules bot's automated intro comment) — this is the first review round.

No blocking issues found.

Verdict

Ready for merge

Structured Review Data (JSON)
{
  "schema_version": "1.1",
  "reviewer": "claude",
  "commit_sha": "7d15d99ae8898c43ffc36d8790799e58d7e101b2",
  "verdict": "CLEAN",
  "findings": [],
  "detailed_assessment": "All four demonstrative-pronoun replacements in the changed subfiles resolve to the correct antecedent noun phrase with no grammar or referent errors introduced.",
  "holistic_assessment": "Scope matches the stated PR description exactly, no math or structural changes require macro or render verification, and no regression risk exists in this prose-only diff."
}

Reviewed commit: 7d15d99

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💰 Cost: $0.2574 (review) — run

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
PR Preview Action v1.8.1
🚀 Preview available at: https://d-morrison.github.io/rme/pr-preview/pr-1166/

Built to branch gh-pages at 2026-09-12 21:19 UTC.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant