Skip to content

fix: use correct hash of quorum as cycle hash for regtest #6673

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

knst
Copy link
Collaborator

@knst knst commented May 17, 2025

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

feature_llmq_singlenode.py works unstable, roughly 10% failure rate. It fails with this error:

2025-05-17T15:03:08.586000Z TestFramework (INFO): InstantSend lock on tx: 202b6698cf0da8adfeff8430daff3d1cfe767d1120751bb7765f6df15d09a3ee is expecting
2025-05-17T15:04:09.033000Z TestFramework.utils (ERROR): wait_until() failed. Predicate: ''''
        def check_instantlock():
            self.bump_mocktime(1)
            try:
                return node.getrawtransaction(txid, True)["instantlock"]
            except:
                return False
'''
2025-05-17T15:04:09.033000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed

Deep in logs the failure look like this:

 node0 2025-05-17T14:40:45.628148Z (mocktime: 2014-12-12T05:56:24Z) [     isman] [llmq/instantsend.cpp:985] [ProcessPendingInstantSendLocks] [instantsend] CInstantSendManager::ProcessPendingInstantSendLocks -- txid=202b6698cf0da8adfeff8430daff3d1cfe767d1120751bb7765f6df15d09a3ee, islock=89b6a8bb50c2a6b07ebd2bbde0727a72ed4fbe4f78247aab509189b50fc7293f: invalid sig in islock, peer=1

Further debug shown that somehow sign-hash sometimes is different; while msgHash is same; signature is valid and bytes-per-bytes matched; just validation code does not work as expected.

What was done?

For non-rotating quorums on RegTest should be used directly quorum hash instead cycleQuorum; no quorum choosing procedure is needed.

How Has This Been Tested?

Run multiple times functional tests.

Breaking Changes

N/A; affect only RegTests for special case of non-rotating quorum used for InstantSend.

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

@knst knst added this to the 23 milestone May 17, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 17, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update the logic in the InstantSend module to handle quorum cycle hash computation and quorum selection differently based on whether quorum rotation is enabled. When rotation is active, the cycle hash is derived from the ancestor block at the calculated cycle height; otherwise, it uses the quorum base block index. Similarly, quorum selection now conditionally uses either the signing quorum (with rotation) or directly retrieves the quorum by type and cycle hash (without rotation). No changes were made to function signatures or public API declarations. No other logic or control flow was altered.

Note

⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf

CodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback.
Learn more here.


Note

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching

CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.
Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9cb43c2 and 4b66448.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/llmq/instantsend.cpp (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: x86_64-apple-darwin / Build depends
  • GitHub Check: x86_64-w64-mingw32 / Build depends
  • GitHub Check: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu_nowallet / Build depends
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/llmq/instantsend.cpp (2)

693-695: Appropriate fix for non-rotating quorums in RegTest mode.

This change correctly addresses the cycleHash calculation for non-rotating quorums. The conditional logic ensures that:

  • For rotating quorums (llmq_params_opt->useRotation == true): The code continues to use the ancestor block at the calculated cycle height
  • For non-rotating quorums (RegTest): It directly uses the quorum base block index

This fixes the instability issue in feature_llmq_singlenode.py test by ensuring the correct hash is used as cycle hash when validating InstantSend locks.


939-941: Consistent handling of quorum selection for non-rotating quorums.

This change maintains consistency with the cycleHash calculation fix:

  • For rotating quorums: Continue using SelectQuorumForSigning which factors in signing height and offset
  • For non-rotating quorums: Directly get the quorum by type and cycle hash

This eliminates the unnecessary quorum choosing procedure for RegTest non-rotating quorums, ensuring the signing process uses the correct quorum hash during verification.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant