-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
fix: intermittent error in feature_governance.py due to exceed amount of votes #6710
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe functional test in test/functional/feature_governance.py was updated to accommodate situations where the vote count may sometimes exceed the expected value of 24. The test logic now waits for the vote count to reach at least 24 and asserts that it remains below 25, allowing for occasional occurrences of a 25th vote. No changes were made to the declarations of exported or public entities. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/functional/feature_governance.py
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
test/functional/feature_governance.py (2)
test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py (1)
wait_until
(900-901)test/functional/test_framework/util.py (1)
assert_greater_than
(72-74)
🪛 Ruff (0.11.9)
test/functional/feature_governance.py
287-287: Undefined name assert_greater_than
(F821)
🪛 Pylint (3.3.7)
test/functional/feature_governance.py
[error] 287-287: Undefined variable 'assert_greater_than'
(E0602)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
- GitHub Check: x86_64-apple-darwin / Build depends
- GitHub Check: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu_multiprocess / Build depends
- GitHub Check: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu_nowallet / Build depends
- GitHub Check: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / Build depends
- GitHub Check: x86_64-w64-mingw32 / Build depends
- GitHub Check: arm-linux-gnueabihf / Build depends
🔇 Additional comments (1)
test/functional/feature_governance.py (1)
286-287
: LGTM! Logic change effectively handles the intermittent 25th vote.The modification correctly implements a range check allowing 24-25 votes instead of requiring exactly 24. This addresses the intermittent test failure described in the PR objectives while maintaining test reliability.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.11.9)
287-287: Undefined name
assert_greater_than
(F821)
🪛 Pylint (3.3.7)
[error] 287-287: Undefined variable 'assert_greater_than'
(E0602)
Good catch! 👍 pls see #6712 |
Issue being fixed or feature implemented
What was done?
This PR is follow-up for #6646
It has been introduced wait_until to wait until governance votes will reach exactly 24, but sometimes it could be 25 of them. This PR relax condition for amount of votes to be 24 or 25.
How Has This Been Tested?
Run multiple times with changes from #6631 + extra changes from local branch; no more failures.
Breaking Changes
N/A
Checklist: