-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Metadata 4.7 updates for orcid_client #41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3cdcd65
Small update to force a build workflow on git.
svogt0511 557155c
Temporary small update to force a build/test action.
svogt0511 05995ec
update the bolognese gem
svogt0511 9c0222f
update the bolognese gem
svogt0511 b25b30b
Bolognese update makes orcid_client incompatible with Ruby 3.0.
svogt0511 8725229
Update work types with poster and presentation equivalents.
svogt0511 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I'm remembering correctly, this section of the code attempts to match free-text resourceType values to ORCID work types. If a resourceType contains only "poster" or "presentation", should we assume that the work is a conference poster or conference presentation? A question for @KellyStathis , I think.
Noting that this only would trigger when resourceTypeGeneral is "Text".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For resourceTypeGeneral "Poster" and "Presentation", we are mapping these to "conference poster" and "conference presentation" in ORCID.
When resourceTypeGeneral is "Text", it looks like we already had the mapping for "poster" or "conference presentation" to "conference presentation" in ORCID. Since we have this in place already, it makes sense for me to also have the equivalent for "presentation" and "conference presentation".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good! My hesitation with adding the
resourceType "presentation" -> ORCID "conference-presentation"mapping is because not all presentations are necessarily conference presentations. We could removeresourceType "presentation" -> ORCID "conference-presentation"andresourceType "poster" -> ORCID "conference-poster", but happy to continue supporting both if that makes sense to you. I doubt this affects that many record regardless.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense! Though since this is the same mapping we're using at the resourceTypeGeneral level, the same concern could apply there. We deliberately used a similar definition to ORCID's (which comes from the COAR work types) but scoped to not be specific to conferences.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let me know if we need changes because of this. I merged this pull request a minute ago.