mark did:cid as DIF recommended#103
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rayback <jrayback@gmail.com>
|
This PR indicates the beginning of the 60-day review period for |
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Rayback <jrayback@gmail.com>
|
Nice to see |
ottomorac
left a comment
ottomorac
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
During the last session my feedback items were the following:
- W3C DID Methods registry for did:cid - https://www.w3.org/TR/did-extensions-methods/#did-methods
- W3C Test suite - https://w3c.github.io/did-test-suite/
Once these are implemented, I am happy to provide my approval.
Also I am happy to assist you with getting PRs merged into the W3C repos if things are getting stuck.
|
Add "Privacy and Security" to the specs document as per W3C requirements. https://www.w3.org/TR/did-1.0/#security-requirements |
|
And register any DID document property names or values that are not part of DID core (e.g., |
|
did:cid published specs have been updated. The update makes the didDocument conformant with DID-CORE as per discussion and recommendations from Markus Sabadello, Otto Mora, and others from the ID Workgroup. https://archon.technology/specs (DIF spec-up published version) https://github.com/archetech/archon/blob/main/docs/scheme.md |
|
Great work @Flaxscrip . I also see the DID test suite PR is under draft: w3c/did-test-suite#240 Once ready for review please ping me and I can help this get moved along. |
|
did:cid is also registered now in https://www.w3.org/TR/did-extensions-methods/#did-methods. No additional extensions to register since our specs now match the core specs objects. |
|
did:cid Universal Resolver Docker container: https://github.com/archetech/uni-resolver-driver-did-cid/pkgs/container/uni-resolver-driver-did-cid |
|
Universal Resolver driver PR (config only): decentralized-identity/universal-resolver#573 |
|
Is this did method specification compatible with https://blog.identity.foundation/dif-is-for-humans/ ? |
5 participants
Mark
did:cidas DIF recommended.