docs: condense Deno version information in one section#100
Merged
bartlomieju merged 1 commit intodenoland:mainfrom Nov 27, 2025
Merged
docs: condense Deno version information in one section#100bartlomieju merged 1 commit intodenoland:mainfrom
bartlomieju merged 1 commit intodenoland:mainfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR tries to condense the
README.mda bit, by condensing the 9 different headers for specifying different kinds ofdeno-versioninto a (hopefully) easier to read section. I think the amount of<h3>'s has grown organically bit-by-bit by new ways to install Deno, until it has become quite a large block.The "Version from input" header should match quite well with the "Version from file" section thematically.
It should be much easier to scan headers for the relevant documentation IMO, and adding e.g. a Table-of-Contents should work better as well.
Preview