Skip to content

fix: use GET requests when using CQL2 STAC filters #30

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 25, 2025

Conversation

jverrydt
Copy link
Contributor

  • Removed filter_lang STAC query param as we only support cql2 text format
  • Use GET request when CQL2 filter is passed because STAC API filter extension does not support this for POST requests yet

Available PR templates

… filter and use GET request as CQL2 filter is not supported yet for POST [GDD-3825]
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.85%. Comparing base (161916b) to head (506bacb).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #30   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.85%   81.85%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines         854      854           
  Branches      103      103           
=======================================
  Hits          699      699           
  Misses        103      103           
  Partials       52       52           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 81.85% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@vincentsarago vincentsarago merged commit 2abb8cc into developmentseed:main Feb 25, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants