-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 398
Fix/optionset preheat n1 master #24850
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6a4fae6
feat: add valid-option-code storage to TrackerPreheat
jason-p-pickering 8c52fed
feat: add OptionValueSupplier, preheat only referenced option codes
jason-p-pickering c8056b9
feat: validate option codes against preheated OptionValueSupplier data
jason-p-pickering c06f7ae
perf: stop preheat from fully materializing OptionSet.options
jason-p-pickering 546c5fd
fix: resolve option codes introduced by program rule ASSIGN actions
jason-p-pickering 10d31c9
test: remove redundant public visibility modifier in AttributeValidat…
jason-p-pickering 833030b
Merge branch 'master' into fix/optionset-preheat-n1-master
jason-p-pickering 9dc6206
test: prove OptionValueSupplier can't validate a fabricated cross-opt…
jason-p-pickering fa70af8
fix: use unnest parallel-array join in OptionValueSupplier
jason-p-pickering File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is more about the architecture / code placement. I am not sure this is the best place. I think @enricocolasante who is back next week might have a better answer than me with regards to rule engine.
If the fix is urgent we could merge it and Enrico and myself can debate on where to move it later on.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a fair flag. I think ( I could be wrong) this is the earliest point which I could find where the rule engine's
ASSIGNexisted to preheat. Happy to wait until @enricocolasante gets back, but considering that we have seen a 5-6x drop in production numbers, I would lean towards merging it and revisiting.