Skip to content

docs(design): in-memory pipeline#389

Merged
yulnr merged 7 commits into
dial9-rs:mainfrom
yulnr:docs/in-memory-pipeline-design
May 18, 2026
Merged

docs(design): in-memory pipeline#389
yulnr merged 7 commits into
dial9-rs:mainfrom
yulnr:docs/in-memory-pipeline-design

Conversation

@yulnr

@yulnr yulnr commented May 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

#279

Adds a design document for the implementation of a full in-memory pipeline that does not rely on writing to disk.
The last section (# 7 open questions) includes some of the items that I don't have any strong preference on.

Comment thread dial9-tokio-telemetry/design/in-memory-pipeline.md Outdated

@rcoh rcoh left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seems pretty much good, worth a prototype

/// via [`Fs::seal`].
pub trait Fs: Send + Sync + 'static {
// --- Write side ---
fn create(&self, path: &Path) -> io::Result<Box<dyn Write + Send>>;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

probably fine but we should benchmark. I would not be surprised if you get significant wins from being able to optimize on the specific type in use.

Comment thread dial9-tokio-telemetry/design/in-memory-pipeline.md Outdated
@yulnr yulnr force-pushed the docs/in-memory-pipeline-design branch from 2e2c02b to b66fee8 Compare May 15, 2026 13:07
@yulnr yulnr added this pull request to the merge queue May 18, 2026
Merged via the queue into dial9-rs:main with commit a782a05 May 18, 2026
19 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request May 18, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants