fix(pr): PR #314 review 4834046731 — use main in Phase 3 publish example - #318
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 23 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical bug scan — no issues found
Scope reviewed: 1 commit (3e32ec63), 1 file (.cursor/commands/pr.md), +1/−1 line.
Change: Phase 3 initial push example now uses literal main instead of <base> placeholder in publish-clean-branch.sh invocation — addresses CodeRabbit review 4834046731 on merged PR #314.
Analysis:
- Docs-only — no executable code, scripts, or runtime paths changed.
- Traced
scripts/git/publish-clean-branch.sh:basealready defaults tomain(base="${2:-main}"). - Divergence recovery block (line 99) and edge-case section still correctly use
<base>placeholder for non-default bases. - No data-loss, crash, auth-bypass, or silent-truncation trigger identified.
Verdict: No critical bugs. No fix PR opened.
Sent by Cursor Automation: Find critical bugs


Summary
Addresses CodeRabbit review 4834046731 on merged PR #314. Conflict markers were already removed in
6fa134c; this applies the remaining recommendation: Phase 3 publish example uses literalmainas the default base branch.Changes
.cursor/commands/pr.mdline 91 —publish-clean-branch.sh … main origin(no conflict markers; divergence block still uses<base>placeholder)