Skip to content

fix(pr): PR #314 review 4834046731 — use main in Phase 3 publish example - #318

Merged
cursor[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/pr314-coderabbit-pr-md-f559
Aug 1, 2026
Merged

fix(pr): PR #314 review 4834046731 — use main in Phase 3 publish example#318
cursor[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/pr314-coderabbit-pr-md-f559

Conversation

@diazMelgarejo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Addresses CodeRabbit review 4834046731 on merged PR #314. Conflict markers were already removed in 6fa134c; this applies the remaining recommendation: Phase 3 publish example uses literal main as the default base branch.

Changes

  • .cursor/commands/pr.md line 91 — publish-clean-branch.sh … main origin (no conflict markers; divergence block still uses <base> placeholder)
Open in Web Open in Cursor 

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@cursor[bot], you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 23 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 5b94d26b-7be7-455c-b70f-21c8a2853e98

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 92e142f and 3e32ec6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .cursor/commands/pr.md

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@cursor
cursor Bot marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2026 07:56

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Critical bug scan — no issues found

Scope reviewed: 1 commit (3e32ec63), 1 file (.cursor/commands/pr.md), +1/−1 line.

Change: Phase 3 initial push example now uses literal main instead of <base> placeholder in publish-clean-branch.sh invocation — addresses CodeRabbit review 4834046731 on merged PR #314.

Analysis:

  • Docs-only — no executable code, scripts, or runtime paths changed.
  • Traced scripts/git/publish-clean-branch.sh: base already defaults to main (base="${2:-main}").
  • Divergence recovery block (line 99) and edge-case section still correctly use <base> placeholder for non-default bases.
  • No data-loss, crash, auth-bypass, or silent-truncation trigger identified.

Verdict: No critical bugs. No fix PR opened.

Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Automation: Find critical bugs

@cursor
cursor Bot merged commit f904a91 into main Aug 1, 2026
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant