chore: remove file from root

[didinele]

Had this in my work tree because of course I would, forgot, did a git add . and git commit last moment before a merge and now it's in the main branch. oops!

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

2 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
discord-js	Ignored		Mar 5, 2026 0:35am
discord-js-guide	Ignored		Mar 5, 2026 0:35am

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: bdc69886-5115-49bb-82a4-4a810ece3721

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 41439d3 and 581544b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• RFC-Caching-Layer.md

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• RFC-Caching-Layer.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The RFC document outlining a proposed async caching layer and modernized manager pattern design was removed from the repository. The deletion removes all design principles, interface specifications, usage examples, and implementation guidance previously documented in this file.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation RFC-Caching-Layer.md	Deleted RFC document containing design proposal for async caching layer, manager pattern architecture, Cache interface specification, and usage examples.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'chore: remove file from root' is vague and does not specify which file was removed or why, making it unclear to someone scanning commit history.	Use a more descriptive title that identifies the specific file being removed, such as 'chore: remove RFC-Caching-Layer.md from root' or 'chore: remove accidental RFC proposal file'.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description check	✅ Passed	The description is related to the changeset, explaining the accidental addition of the file and the reason for its removal.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch chore/remove-file

Tip

Try Coding Plans. Let us write the prompt for your AI agent so you can ship faster (with fewer bugs).
Share your feedback on Discord.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[vladfrangu]

ngl we could've just kept it in a rfcs folder but 😄