Added "scope" to docker-cli compose

[glyif]

Fixes #410

- What I did
I updated the docker-cli's compose to be able to take in scope as a network key with a value of swarm or local. feature request for : #410

- How I did it
I updated the config_schema, added the scope to the Network Config struct, generated new bindata, edited tests to test for the scope.

- How to verify it
This currently only works with the --compose-file flag in the docker-cli, but doesn't work with docker-compose yet. I will be working on that next

- Description for the changelog
I updated the config_schema, added the scope to the Network Config struct, generated new bindata, edited tests to test for the scope.

- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)
My dogs, Hex the Husky (left) and Linux the Aussie (right).

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #420 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #420      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   52.96%   52.96%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files         244      244              
  Lines       15828    15829       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         8383     8384       +1     
  Misses       6891     6891              
  Partials      554      554

[dnephin]

LGTM

[vdemeester]

LGTM 🐸
/cc @vieux @dnephin same question as before, Is 17.08 freeze in place ? if yes, the schema modification should target 3.5 instead of 3.4.

[dnephin]

afaik we're still good for 3.4

[thaJeztah]

@glyif looks like this needs a rebase

@dnephin @vdemeester is this ready to go other than a rebase?

[vdemeester]

@thaJeztah @dnephin I think we missed the 3.4 window 😅 but other than that we are good to go 👼

[dnephin]

I think so, this will need to be moved to the 3.5 schema since 3.4 has been released, but we can do that as a follow up if necessary

[vdemeester]

@dnephin @thaJeztah @glyif Added a 3.7 schema version (as 3.6 is already on 18.02) and rebased this PR 👼

[thaJeztah]

LGTM

[vdemeester]

cc @shin- for docker/compose 👼

[dnephin]

Hmm, thinking about this again. Are we sure this is something we want to expose in the Compose file?

If someone uses scope: local will the services actually be able to connect to it? I guess only if the service is on the same node?

[thaJeztah]

moving back to design review

ping @fcrisciani WDYT?

[fcrisciani]

@thaJeztah host, none, bridge are all only local networks, overlay is only swarm scope and macvlan can be both, but in the case of swarm scope a config is going to be needed for each node. Not super clear to me how these possible scenarios are actually handled with a simple compose

[dankolesnikov]

Will this be merged anytime soon? Thx!

[unixfox]

Would love to see this PR merged!

[nbx3]

Any chance of this being merged?