QE-18127 add debug logging for browser steps

[ddl-kavya]

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

• Bugfix
• Feature
• Code style update (formatting)
• Refactoring (no functional changes)
• CI related changes
• Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: https://dominodatalab.atlassian.net/browse/QE-18127

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

Other information

[ddl-cedricyoung]

@ddl-kavya

1. I think this ticket requires a little more comprehensive approach. There is a lot of methods in this file browser_steps.py that don't have logging.
2. Also I think we're missing logging at a higher level, that is in the set method for config.CONFIG[variable] =
3. And we should update tests to ensure this logging continues to work.

[ddl-kavya]

@ddl-cedricyoung If we add logging at

@ddl-kavya

1. I think this ticket requires a little more comprehensive approach. There is a lot of methods in this file browser_steps.py that don't have logging.
2. Also I think we're missing logging at a higher level, that is in the set method for config.CONFIG[variable] =
3. And we should update tests to ensure this logging continues to work.

@ddl-cedricyoung if we add logging at higher level in the set method, it will log all the config values useful(port,host_address, scenario metadata, hooks, timeouts, browser info) and sensitive(credentials, tokens, API keys, cookies, headers, 2FA secrets). Even if we just capture just useful information it's too much noise in the report.

[ddl-cedricyoung]

@ddl-cedricyoung if we add logging at higher level in the set method, it will log all the config values useful(port,host_address, scenario metadata, hooks, timeouts, browser info) and sensitive(credentials, tokens, API keys, cookies, headers, 2FA secrets). Even if we just capture just useful information it's too much noise in the repor

@ddl-kavya did you try it? I'm assuming that the secret scrubbing already scrubs out the sensitive info, but I might be mistaken.

[ddl-kavya]

@ddl-cedricyoung Yes, I tried it in my local and it is not scrubbing the sensitive information.
Below is the screenshot from one of the tests. All these config values are logged