-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 329
Async Generic Helpers #4334
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
benrr101
wants to merge
10
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
dev/russellben/async-helpers-generic
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Async Generic Helpers #4334
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cc8da2f
Extract AsyncHelper from SqlUtil.cs into the utilities namespace
benrr101 e20fc9b
Implement AsyncHelpers with generic state, add unit tests
benrr101 ab424fa
Change existing async helper calls in SqlBulkCopy.cs
benrr101 1608dfd
Change existing async helper calls in TdsParser.cs
benrr101 80beeff
Change existing async helper calls in TdsParser.cs
benrr101 734fa77
Change existing async helper calls in SqlCommand
benrr101 c0127ec
Remove old tests
benrr101 e516e3b
Comments from copilot round 1
benrr101 8a3ff94
Address feedback from wraith - including constraining state types to …
benrr101 e85c55c
Fix tests for last change
benrr101 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can this be static or is it now capturing instance state? if it's capturing that's a slight memory performance regression.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No this one is not static. There are still improvements that can be made to make more callbacks static. At this point, having a separate overload for a one-off situation where the exception type needs to be changed isn't worth it. It's also worth noting that the success callback is not static, nor is the exception converter itself. As such, I'm not sure it will make much of a difference.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It depends how often it's called. If it's once per field it could be significant. It's unlikely to cause time problems but it could add to memory thrashing. I only called this one out because it's changed from static to non-static, existing non-statics were already being pinned by some sort of capture.
I did a pass through the whole codebase years ago and made everything that was capable static, that's why there's weird use of Tuple and some TaskCompletionSource state smuggling