-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
ReaderWriterLock in PropertyDictionary #4374
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
rainersigwald
wants to merge
9
commits into
dotnet:master
from
rainersigwald:propertydictionary-readerwriterlockslim
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
60f9d98
ReaderWriterLock in PropertyDictionary
rainersigwald ddf872e
Avoid recursive read lock in ToDictionary
rainersigwald 0de9fc2
fixup! ReaderWriterLock in PropertyDictionary
rainersigwald 4bf72b6
Expand lock in CopyOnReadEnumerable
rainersigwald 7c65b97
Pass PropertyDictionary's ReaderWriterLockSlim to the CopyOnReadEnume…
rainersigwald 15c5052
Merge remote-tracking branch 'Microsoft/master' into propertydictiona…
rainersigwald f9025d1
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into propertydictionar…
rainersigwald 51d0f5e
Revert "Disable GraphBuild tests to avoid #4368 (#4501)"
rainersigwald ad7be43
Allow recursion
rainersigwald File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can eliminate this field now and use the RW lock? It doesn't matter what the object is so long as it's readonly and private. That will claw back the size increase in this object form adding the RW lock field.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Disregard, I didn't view the full diff. You still use that syncroot in another path.