Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Move runtime async method validation into initial binding #78310
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move runtime async method validation into initial binding #78310
Changes from 10 commits
351c386
442f9f8
216d5c9
ff721e5
1f5aefc
33a4423
7918319
9df8371
c10918c
459f528
0e5c942
fa1b1d9
20273bb
5a789ef
3bb7189
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be nice if there a way to say something like
methodReturn.InternalSpecialType is InternalSpecialType.Task or Task_T or ValueTask or ValueTask_T
. No need to try and dig up a way to do that though.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, I think we can, since this is special types, not well-known types.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a corresponding update to the design doc? Or should we have a follow-up comment to make the
void
-returning method scenario work at some point? #PendingThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Need to update the design doc, the runtime-side is very clear that only Task/ValueTask methods can be runtime async.