Skip to content

Build images on dedicated runners#578

Merged
Y-- merged 1 commit intomainfrom
yl/split-docker-builds
Feb 6, 2025
Merged

Build images on dedicated runners#578
Y-- merged 1 commit intomainfrom
yl/split-docker-builds

Conversation

@Y--
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Y-- Y-- commented Feb 6, 2025

Docker build was recently failing because building an image for the ARM64 CPU on an AMD64 runner was prohibitively slow.

In this PR, we build each image on a dedicated runner matching the target platform.

In a following one, we will merge the two images and push them under an unified tag.

@JelteF JelteF mentioned this pull request Feb 6, 2025
@JelteF JelteF added this to the 0.3.0 milestone Feb 6, 2025
And tag image per platform
@Y-- Y-- force-pushed the yl/split-docker-builds branch from 7fb8bd7 to 9926217 Compare February 6, 2025 13:42
@Y-- Y-- changed the title Try fixing docker Build images on dedicated runners Feb 6, 2025
@Y-- Y-- requested a review from JelteF February 6, 2025 13:51
@Y-- Y-- marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2025 13:51
@Y-- Y-- enabled auto-merge (squash) February 6, 2025 14:32
@Y-- Y-- merged commit 662c230 into main Feb 6, 2025
13 checks passed
@Y-- Y-- deleted the yl/split-docker-builds branch February 6, 2025 14:32
JelteF added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2025
Makes our lives a lot easier by making sure we cannot run into
self-deadlocks anymore. This allows us to be a lot more liberal with
sprinkling this lock around, which makes it a lot more easy to write
thread safe code.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants