Skip to content

eagerspark-cmd/ai-model-comparison

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

1 Commit
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

AI Model Comparison

Compare AI models with real benchmark data, not marketing claims. This repo tracks the latest model releases with pricing, speed, and quality metrics — updated monthly.

Quick Comparison Table (June 2026)

Model Provider Input $/M Output $/M Latency Coding Reasoning
DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek $0.14 $0.28 420ms 9.2/10 8.8/10
GPT-4o OpenAI $2.50 $10.00 680ms 9.4/10 9.1/10
Claude 4 Sonnet Anthropic $3.00 $15.00 750ms 9.1/10 9.3/10
Qwen3-32B Alibaba $0.10 $0.35 510ms 8.9/10 8.5/10
Kimi K2.5 Moonshot $0.50 $1.00 560ms 8.7/10 8.6/10
GLM-5 Zhipu $0.40 $1.20 530ms 8.5/10 8.4/10

Why This Comparison Matters

Most AI model comparisons use synthetic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval) that don't reflect real-world usage. We test models on actual developer tasks: building APIs, debugging code, writing documentation, and solving business problems.

Testing Methodology

  • Coding: 200 tasks across Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust
  • Reasoning: Logic puzzles, math problems, business case analysis
  • Each model gets 3 attempts per task — we take the best result
  • All tests use the same prompt for fair comparison

Pricing Data Source

Pricing data is collected from official provider websites and updated monthly. For the most current pricing, use the Global API pricing page.

How to Run Your Own Comparisons

from openai import OpenAI

models_to_test = [
    "deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash",
    "qwen/qwen3-32b",
    "moonshot/kimi-k2.5",
]

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://global-apis.com/v1",
    api_key="your-global-api-key",
)

test_prompt = "Write a Python function that implements a LRU cache with O(1) operations."

for model in models_to_test:
    response = client.chat.completions.create(
        model=model,
        messages=[{"role": "user", "content": test_prompt}],
        max_tokens=500,
    )
    print(f"{model}: {len(response.choices[0].message.content)} chars")

Chinese Model Comparison

Chinese AI models (DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, GLM) now match or exceed Western models on many tasks — at 10-100x lower cost:

Model Chinese English Math Code Price
DeepSeek V4 Flash 9.5 9.2 8.8 9.2 $0.28/M
Qwen3-32B 9.3 8.9 8.5 8.9 $0.35/M
Kimi K2.5 9.4 8.7 8.6 8.7 $1.00/M
GLM-5 9.2 8.5 8.4 8.5 $1.20/M

Contributing

Have benchmark results to add? Open a PR with your test data and methodology. We accept results from any provider as long as the testing methodology is documented.

Links

About

Comprehensive AI model comparison — benchmarks, pricing, and real-world performance data

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors