Skip to content

Conversation

@weareoutman
Copy link
Member

@weareoutman weareoutman commented Oct 18, 2024

依赖检查

组件之间的依赖声明,是微服务组件架构下的重要信息,请确保其正确性。

请勾选以下两组选项其中之一:

  • 本次 MR 没有使用上游组件(例如框架、后台组件等)的较新版本提供的特性。

或者:

  • 本次 MR 使用了上游组件(例如框架、后台组件等)的较新版本提供的特性。
  • 在对应的文件中更新了该上游组件的依赖版本(或确认了当前声明的依赖版本已包含本次 MR 使用的新特性)。

提交信息检查

Git 提交信息将决定包的版本发布及自动生成的 CHANGELOG,请检查工作内容与提交信息是否相符,并在以下每组选项中都依次确认。

破坏性变更是针对于下游使用者而言,可以通过本次改动对下游使用者的影响来识别变更类型:

  • 下游使用者不做任何改动,仍可以正常工作时,那么它属于普通变更。
  • 反之,下游使用者不做改动就无法正常工作时,那么它属于破坏性变更。

例如,构件修改了一个属性名,小产品 Storyboard 中需要使用新属性名才能工作,那么它就是破坏性变更。
又例如,构件还没有任何下游使用者,那么它的任何变更都是普通变更。

破坏性变更:

  • ⚠️ 本次 MR 包含破坏性变更的提交,请继续确认以下所有选项:
  • 没有更好的兼容方案,必须做破坏性变更。
  • 使用了 feat 作为提交类型。
  • 标注了 BREAKING CHANGE: 你的变更说明
  • 同时更新了本仓库中所有下游使用者的调用。
  • 同时更新了本仓库中所有下游使用者对该子包的依赖为即将发布的 major 版本。
  • 同时为其它仓库的 Migrating 做好了准备,例如文档或批量改动的方法。
  • 手动验证过破坏性变更在 Migrate 后可以正常工作。
  • 破坏性变更所在的提交没有意外携带其它子包的改动。

新特性:

  • 本次 MR 包含新特性的提交,且该提交不带有破坏性变更,并使用了 feat 作为提交类型。
  • 给新特性添加了单元测试。
  • 手动验证过新特性可以正常工作。

问题修复:

  • 本次 MR 包含问题修复的提交,且该提交不带有新特性或破坏性变更,并使用了 fix 作为提交类型。
  • 给问题修复添加了单元测试。
  • 手动验证过问题修复得到解决。

杂项工作:

即所有对下游使用者无任何影响、且没有必要显示在 CHANGELOG 中的改动,例如修改注释、测试用例、开发文档等:

  • 本次 MR 包含杂项工作的提交,且该提交不带有问题修复、新特性或破坏性变更,并使用了 chore, docs, test 等作为提交类型。

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 新功能

    • 在嵌套路由中引入了 mountCount 变量,用于跟踪组件挂载次数,提升了路由和渲染系统的功能。
    • 新增 output 组件,动态显示 mountCount 的当前值,增强了用户交互体验。
  • 测试

    • 扩展了测试用例,以验证 mountCount 在不同导航场景下的增量行为,确保状态正确保留和更新。

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Walkthrough

此次更改主要集中在 Runtime.spec.ts 文件中,增强了路由和渲染系统的功能。引入了一个新的上下文变量 mountCount,用于跟踪组件的挂载次数,并在每次挂载时递增。新增的 output 砖块在 sub-routes-nested/2 路由中显示当前的 mountCount 值,动态更新以反映生命周期事件的变化。此外,测试也进行了扩展,以验证在不同导航场景下 mountCount 的递增行为。

Changes

文件路径 更改摘要
packages/runtime/src/internal/... 增加 mountCount 变量以跟踪组件挂载次数,添加 output 砖块以动态显示该值,扩展测试以验证新的功能。

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.20%. Comparing base (6d9cef1) to head (188c6c3).
Report is 2 commits behind head on v3.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##               v3    #4523      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.21%   95.20%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         205      205              
  Lines        8860     8860              
  Branches     1681     1681              
==========================================
- Hits         8436     8435       -1     
- Misses        319      320       +1     
  Partials      105      105              

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@cypress
Copy link

cypress bot commented Oct 18, 2024

next-core    Run #10674

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #10674  •  git commit ef97ee0973 ℹ️: Merge 188c6c3d681867a2bb22b886c31f6dd5c04078a7 into 6d9cef1bd1046d24c9977c19216e...
Project next-core
Run status status check passed Passed #10674
Run duration 00m 22s
Commit git commit ef97ee0973 ℹ️: Merge 188c6c3d681867a2bb22b886c31f6dd5c04078a7 into 6d9cef1bd1046d24c9977c19216e...
Committer Shenwei Wang
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 0
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 0
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 16

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6d9cef1 and 188c6c3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/runtime/src/internal/Runtime.spec.ts (7 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/runtime/src/internal/Runtime.spec.ts (3)

273-278: 良好:成功初始化 'mountCount' 上下文变量

在 '/sub-routes-nested' 路由中,正确添加了 'mountCount' 上下文变量,初始值为 0,便于后续的挂载计数。


313-324: 良好:'output' 砖块正确显示并更新 'mountCount'

在 '/sub-routes-nested/2' 路由中,添加了 'output' 砖块,成功显示当前的 'mountCount' 值。通过在 'onMount' 生命周期中使用 'context.replace' 操作,实现了每次组件挂载时对 'mountCount' 的递增,逻辑实现正确。


1270-1301: 良好:导航至兄弟路由时 'mountCount' 正常递增

测试显示,从 '/app-a/sub-routes-nested/1' 导航到 '/app-a/sub-routes-nested/2' 时,'mountCount' 值递增至 2,符合预期的递增逻辑,功能正常。

@weareoutman weareoutman merged commit 3838aaf into v3 Oct 18, 2024
4 of 5 checks passed
@weareoutman weareoutman deleted the steve/v3-debug-sub-routes branch October 18, 2024 06:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants