fix(): report load time when load brick failed #4560
Conversation
Walkthrough此次更改主要集中在 Changes
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
packages/loader/src/stableLoadBricks.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 ESLint couldn't find the config "@next-core/eslint-config-next" to extend from. Please check that the name of the config is correct. The config "@next-core/eslint-config-next" was referenced from the config file in "/.eslintrc". If you still have problems, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## v3 #4560 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 95.23% 95.23%
=======================================
Files 206 206
Lines 8917 8919 +2
Branches 1700 1700
=======================================
+ Hits 8492 8494 +2
Misses 319 319
Partials 106 106
|
next-core
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
next-core
|
| Branch Review |
steve/v3-brick-load-time
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 00m 23s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Shenwei Wang |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
16
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/loader/src/stableLoadBricks.ts (1)
207-214: 错误信息增强建议错误信息中包含加载时间是个好主意，但建议考虑以下优化：
- 可以将时间格式化逻辑抽取为一个独立的工具函数，以提高代码的可维护性
- 考虑在开发环境中提供更详细的错误信息
建议重构如下:
+ const formatLoadTime = (cost: number): string => + cost > 1000 ? `${+(cost / 1000).toFixed(2)}s` : `${cost}ms`; const cost = Math.round(performance.now() - start); throw new BrickLoadError( `Load ${type} of "${item.fullName}" failed${ process.env.NODE_ENV === "test" ? "" : ` (${formatLoadTime(cost)})` }: ${(error as Error)?.message}` );
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/loader/src/stableLoadBricks.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/loader/src/stableLoadBricks.ts (2)
201-201: 性能监控的良好实践！
添加性能测量来跟踪模块加载时间是一个很好的改进。这有助于识别和诊断加载性能问题。
209-214: 验证环境变量使用的安全性
需要验证在所有运行环境中 process.env.NODE_ENV 是否都能正确获取，以避免潜在的运行时错误。
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that process.env.NODE_ENV is widely used across the codebase in a consistent and safe manner. The usage patterns show it's primarily used for:
- Development-only warnings and debug logs
- Test environment specific behaviors
- Production build optimizations
The specific usage in the review comment's context (packages/loader/src/stableLoadBricks.ts) is also following a safe pattern with proper fallback handling.
Let me generate the final response:
process.env.NODE_ENV 的使用是安全的
该环境变量在整个代码库中被广泛且一致地使用，主要用于：
- 测试环境下的特殊行为控制
- 开发环境下的调试信息输出
- 生产环境的优化处理
当前代码中的使用方式符合这些标准模式，并且有适当的后备处理机制，不会导致运行时错误。
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 检查代码库中 process.env.NODE_ENV 的使用情况
rg "process\.env\.NODE_ENV" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 8913
依赖检查
组件之间的依赖声明，是微服务组件架构下的重要信息，请确保其正确性。
请勾选以下两组选项其中之一：
或者：
提交信息检查
Git 提交信息将决定包的版本发布及自动生成的 CHANGELOG，请检查工作内容与提交信息是否相符，并在以下每组选项中都依次确认。
破坏性变更：
feat作为提交类型。BREAKING CHANGE: 你的变更说明。新特性：
feat作为提交类型。问题修复：
fix作为提交类型。杂项工作：
即所有对下游使用者无任何影响、且没有必要显示在 CHANGELOG 中的改动，例如修改注释、测试用例、开发文档等：
chore,docs,test等作为提交类型。Summary by CodeRabbit
新功能
性能改进