feat(): useProvider 缓存失效 #4568
feat(): useProvider 缓存失效 #4568
Conversation
Closes CMDB_CONSUME-382
Walkthrough此拉取请求对 Changes
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint (1.23.1)
packages/react-runtime/src/useProvider/fetch.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 ESLint couldn't find the config "@next-core/eslint-config-next" to extend from. Please check that the name of the config is correct. The config "@next-core/eslint-config-next" was referenced from the config file in "/.eslintrc". If you still have problems, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## v3 #4568 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 95.23% 95.22% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 206 206
Lines 8911 8924 +13
Branches 1697 1701 +4
==========================================
+ Hits 8486 8498 +12
Misses 319 319
- Partials 106 107 +1
|
next-core
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
next-core
|
| Branch Review |
alex/updateMonitorIcon
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 00m 22s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Chén Wénháo |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
16
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/react-runtime/src/useProvider/fetch.ts (1)
52-52: 建议提取缓存模式为常量当前的实现直接使用字符串字面量
"default"和"reload"作为缓存模式。建议将这些值提取为命名常量，以提高代码的可维护性和复用性。+const CACHE_MODES = { + DEFAULT: "default" as const, + RELOAD: "reload" as const, +} as const; -return fetchByProvider(provider, args, {cache: cache ? "default" : "reload"}) as Promise<TData>; +return fetchByProvider(provider, args, {cache: cache ? CACHE_MODES.DEFAULT : CACHE_MODES.RELOAD}) as Promise<TData>;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/react-runtime/src/useProvider/fetch.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/react-runtime/src/useProvider/fetch.ts (3)
Line range hint 37-41: 类型声明改进获得认可！
显式声明返回类型 Promise<TData> 提高了代码的类型安全性和可读性。这是一个很好的改进。
Line range hint 37-57: 总体评估：实现合理，无破坏性变更
- 类型系统改进增强了代码的可靠性
- 缓存控制逻辑保持向后兼容
- 新的缓存选项实现清晰且符合预期
建议：
- 关注缓存策略的一致性
- 考虑提取常量以提高可维护性
整体来看，这些更改符合PR的目标，且不会对现有功能造成破坏性影响。
Line range hint 43-44: 建议验证缓存失效策略的一致性
当前的缓存失效实现依赖于 cache 参数和 cacheKey 的组合。建议确认这种实现方式与系统中其他地方的缓存策略保持一致。
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about cache-related implementations to verify the consistency.
缓存策略实现已验证一致
经过分析，当前的缓存实现策略是合理且一致的：
- 在
packages/react-runtime/src/useProvider/fetch.ts中的缓存实现遵循了以下模式：- 使用 Map 数据结构存储缓存
- 基于参数构建唯一的缓存键
- 在需要时正确清除缓存
- 支持缓存开关控制
这种实现方式与系统中其他缓存实现（如 packages/runtime/src/internal/data/resolveData.ts 和 packages/loader/src/loadScriptOrStyle.ts）保持一致，都采用了类似的缓存管理策略。
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 搜索其他相似的缓存实现
rg -A 3 "cacheMap\.delete" --type ts
Length of output: 384
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# 搜索所有缓存相关的实现
rg -A 5 "cache.*Map" --type ts
# 查找可能的缓存键生成逻辑
rg -A 3 "cacheKey" --type ts
# 查找其他可能的缓存操作
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = new Map<$_, $_>()'
Length of output: 14586
Closes CMDB_CONSUME-382
依赖检查
组件之间的依赖声明，是微服务组件架构下的重要信息，请确保其正确性。
请勾选以下两组选项其中之一：
或者：
提交信息检查
Git 提交信息将决定包的版本发布及自动生成的 CHANGELOG，请检查工作内容与提交信息是否相符，并在以下每组选项中都依次确认。
破坏性变更：
feat作为提交类型。BREAKING CHANGE: 你的变更说明。新特性：
feat作为提交类型。问题修复：
fix作为提交类型。杂项工作：
即所有对下游使用者无任何影响、且没有必要显示在 CHANGELOG 中的改动，例如修改注释、测试用例、开发文档等：
chore,docs,test等作为提交类型。Summary by CodeRabbit